AngryScientist
01-26-2012, 06:46 AM
http://www.zipp.com/_media/pdfs/technology/spokecount.pdf
from Conclusion:
Conclusion
In conclusion it seems that the basic conceptual design of the wheel, and it’s spokes, is more important than small detail changes in spoke count. Individually, these changes are moderate, but taken as a whole, the results are quite large. One could theorize that changing from 32 round to 32 oval spokes would provide a differential in wattage to spin, by as much as 10 watts, but to move from 32 round spokes to 18 or 20 ovalized ones can yield more than 20 watts of improvement. However, once these major improvements have been made, small changes in spoke shape or count are marginal at best. In the 404 test, we see that adding 12 additional spokes leaves us a possible increase in wattage of only 1-5 watts, and the move from 18 to 16 spokes seems to have essentially no benefit whatsoever, so the key is to be aware of what other factors may be sacrificed for these minute or nonexistent advantages.
from Conclusion:
Conclusion
In conclusion it seems that the basic conceptual design of the wheel, and it’s spokes, is more important than small detail changes in spoke count. Individually, these changes are moderate, but taken as a whole, the results are quite large. One could theorize that changing from 32 round to 32 oval spokes would provide a differential in wattage to spin, by as much as 10 watts, but to move from 32 round spokes to 18 or 20 ovalized ones can yield more than 20 watts of improvement. However, once these major improvements have been made, small changes in spoke shape or count are marginal at best. In the 404 test, we see that adding 12 additional spokes leaves us a possible increase in wattage of only 1-5 watts, and the move from 18 to 16 spokes seems to have essentially no benefit whatsoever, so the key is to be aware of what other factors may be sacrificed for these minute or nonexistent advantages.