Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 03-05-2024, 09:23 AM
XXtwindad XXtwindad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 8,058
I don’t want to exacerbate the “who is more culpable” debate here. The cyclist was stupid, and the driver was criminal.

I am wondering, from a legal perspective, how culpable the driver is. Can the cyclist sue her? He did (somewhat brazenly) run a red light.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-05-2024, 09:50 AM
C40_guy's Avatar
C40_guy C40_guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 5,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
I don’t want to exacerbate the “who is more culpable” debate here. The cyclist was stupid, and the driver was criminal.

I am wondering, from a legal perspective, how culpable the driver is. Can the cyclist sue her? He did (somewhat brazenly) run a red light.
Agreed on the first.

With regard to the second...is this the same state in which some idjit poured hot McDees coffee in their lap and then successfully sued the chain for their own stupidity?
__________________
Colnagi
Seven
Sampson
Hot Tubes
LiteSpeed
SpeshFatboy
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-05-2024, 10:30 AM
Alistair Alistair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXtwindad View Post
I am wondering, from a legal perspective, how culpable the driver is. Can the cyclist sue her? He did (somewhat brazenly) run a red light.
He did file a civil suit, not criminal, and also named the county, city, and state as well. Seems like typical ambulance-chasing stuff.

The county/city/state shouldn't be on the suit at all, unless there's something negligent about the intersection design or similar.

The woman, I can see the guy claiming that by her leaving the scene, he was subjected to additional damages (mental, etc). Not that I buy it personally.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-05-2024, 10:36 AM
Alistair Alistair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by C40_guy View Post
With regard to the second...is this the same state in which some idjit poured hot McDees coffee in their lap and then successfully sued the chain for their own stupidity?
FWIW, McD's had a history of settling suits over coffee burns. And at the time, it was their policy to serve the coffee at 190*+, which is well into 3rd degree burn territory. And they were caught lying about the reason for serving coffee so hot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebec...7s_Restaurants

None of which is to say holding hot coffee in your lap makes sense, but really, massive third degree burns shouldn't occur from a simple drink spill either.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.