Builder's Spotlight The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > Bike Fit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-25-2017, 06:47 AM
n1ey n1ey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 7
crankarm length - gearing

Hallo!
Slowly trying to build to my goal for more efficiency. I am wondering about torque numbers and thus gearing. Do people any have thoughts on which chainrings and crankarm length for a given torque number?

Which torque numbers are we supposed to achieve at your power zone 6? Perhaps as a cyclist with 3.5 w/kg?

I am wondering if I should go back to a 52 or 53 and go with a longer crankarm. I have a 50/34 on the front with 175mm cranks. Or do I have this as the wrong way? Go with a 48 or some cx ring and 180mm cranks?

My saddle to pedal is at 82.2cm with the 175mm cranks.

On an effort to take a very short KOM, I averaged 500 watts. GC calculated numbers at 300 N. This was around 100RPM.

Any thoughts to steer me in the right direction would be helpful.

bill
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2017, 06:45 AM
noahwcollins noahwcollins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3
I'm a coach with Carmichael Training Systems. Crank arm length is really based on preference of the rider. Not only that but you will find that with the longer crank, if you are a shorter person, you might eventually have some anterior knee pain.

That being said, I think you are putting too much stock in the numbers instead of focusing on efficiency alone (angular velocity)--cadence. Power numbers are great for training and comparison, but the only way for you to find out what cranks you should ride is to try them out and see how you like them. Shorter cranks are awesome for crits and fast accelerations...but of course the longer cranks allow for the torque you speak of.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2017, 06:45 AM
n1ey n1ey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by noahwcollins View Post
I'm a coach with Carmichael Training Systems. Crank arm length is really based on preference of the rider. Not only that but you will find that with the longer crank, if you are a shorter person, you might eventually have some anterior knee pain.

That being said, I think you are putting too much stock in the numbers instead of focusing on efficiency alone (angular velocity)--cadence. Power numbers are great for training and comparison, but the only way for you to find out what cranks you should ride is to try them out and see how you like them. Shorter cranks are awesome for crits and fast accelerations...but of course the longer cranks allow for the torque you speak of.
I had 100 RPM on this effort that I selected as representative of one of my peaks. Would I be better to go for 90RPM? This isn't a crit. I don't think I ever will succeed in a crit. The speed out of the corners has been tough for me. I am holding in a nice steady road race.

bill
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.