Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old 09-22-2015, 10:04 AM
cinema cinema is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,334
I wonder if the resulting computer code to bypass emission testing was the result of a significant increase in environmental standards that are unsustainable for diesel. i literally have no idea and am not a diesel guy or even a car guy.

To that extent, how sustainable are they for regular gasoline cars? are other manufacturers doing the same thing to skirt unrealistic regulations? I'm as pinko commie as they come but am always wary of unrealistic regulation (often fueled by partisan infighting). it not only affects large business but we the peeps who live among them. headline today was dow plunges over 200 points with fears over VW debocle. how this actually reasonably relates to thousands of different publicly traded companies in every industry is beyond me but my 401k doesn't care about reason.

Last edited by cinema; 09-22-2015 at 10:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 09-22-2015, 10:10 AM
GScot GScot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Laveen, AZ
Posts: 495
I bought a 2014 with a manual last year and love it. In the camp of fix it and move on. If the fix makes the car suck then I'll be upset.

What I'm dying to know is just how big their balls were in skirting emissions so long. I'll rate that upon finding out if there is a cheaply deployed in the field fix that brings everything into compliance such as a software update and maybe a simple mechanical update like a additional/bigger/etc catalyst. Or if it is an ordeal that requires extensive mechanical mods.
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 09-22-2015, 10:26 AM
Ken Robb Ken Robb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Jolla, Ca.
Posts: 16,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by GScot View Post
I bought a 2014 with a manual last year and love it. In the camp of fix it and move on. If the fix makes the car suck then I'll be upset.

What I'm dying to know is just how big their balls were in skirting emissions so long. I'll rate that upon finding out if there is a cheaply deployed in the field fix that brings everything into compliance such as a software update and maybe a simple mechanical update like a additional/bigger/etc catalyst. Or if it is an ordeal that requires extensive mechanical mods.
If VW could easily fix the emissions problem without adversely affecting economy and/or performance they would have done that from the start rather than develop the cheater program. They could have used urea injection like BMW and Mercedes did. They chose to save the cost of those systems and gain the sales advantage of telling potential buyers that they would not face the added bother and expense of buying/adding urea fluid to a VW. Major STUPID decision.
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 09-22-2015, 10:37 AM
zap zap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Robb View Post
If VW could easily fix the emissions problem without adversely affecting economy and/or performance they would have done that from the start rather than develop the cheater program. They could have used urea injection like BMW and Mercedes did. They chose to save the cost of those systems and gain the sales advantage of telling potential buyers that they would not face the added bother and expense of buying/adding urea fluid to a VW. Major STUPID decision.
'15 Golf TDI does have urea injection.

http://www.tflcar.com/2014/08/does-t...essors-review/
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 09-22-2015, 10:41 AM
GScot GScot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Laveen, AZ
Posts: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Robb View Post
If VW could easily fix the emissions problem without adversely affecting economy and/or performance they would have done that from the start rather than develop the cheater program. They could have used urea injection like BMW and Mercedes did. They chose to save the cost of those systems and gain the sales advantage of telling potential buyers that they would not face the added bother and expense of buying/adding urea fluid to a VW. Major STUPID decision.
Certainly what it looks like and that means they had the nerve to think it could never bite them in the ass down the road. If they have an easily installed by dealer quick fix that doesn't require butchering the car I'll figure that was a contingency plan.
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 09-22-2015, 11:26 AM
druptight's Avatar
druptight druptight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kittery, ME
Posts: 2,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by alessandro View Post
This is a wild story about regulatory authority, but mainly about chance:

It Took E.P.A. Pressure to Get VW to Admit Fault
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/bu...mit-fault.html
Here's the interesting part for me - I've read a lot of people claiming that even though it was 40x above regulatory standards, our TDI's are still belching out way less crap than most cars on the road. This quote seems to refute that:

Quote:
In the lab, the two VWs performed flawlessly. But when they were taken out on the roads in California, they were belching out levels of nitrogen oxide that were 30 to 40 times higher than the regulatory standards. Even the heavy-duty trucks the researchers had tested had never performed that poorly by comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 09-22-2015, 11:36 AM
jghall jghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,828
Not read all 17 pages, so apologies if already linked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0BR...ature=youtu.be
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 09-22-2015, 11:42 AM
verticaldoug verticaldoug is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,314
http://www.theicct.org/sites/default...al_may2014.pdf

This is the research report presented by West Virginia which kicked off the problem.

Page 38 has the set-up for testing.

Apologies if this has already been posted by 17 pages is a lot to page. We should just get a masochistic viewall option.
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 09-22-2015, 11:46 AM
pff pff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by GScot View Post
I bought a 2014 with a manual last year and love it. In the camp of fix it and move on. If the fix makes the car suck then I'll be upset.
Fix it and move on? Presumably it's impossible to fix, or they would have fixed it in the first place. This wasn't a mistake or an oversight, this was obviously intentional. And even if they could wave a magic wand to fix emissions without making the car perform worse, the damage to the environment and public health over the last ten years is not reversible. The most likely outcome seems to be the company pays a big fine, hurting the shareholders but leaving the execs' golden parachute intact. We really need to see some jail time for the execs behind this if we don't want this kind of corporate malfeasance to be discouraged. I'm also a bit disappointed that the standards bodies designed a test that was so easy to defeat.
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 09-22-2015, 11:56 AM
ofcounsel's Avatar
ofcounsel ofcounsel is offline
Soy Un Perdedor
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 1,349
Nevermind

Last edited by ofcounsel; 01-29-2016 at 12:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #251  
Old 09-22-2015, 11:58 AM
93legendti 93legendti is offline
Adam/SerottaFan
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinema View Post
I wonder if the resulting computer code to bypass emission testing was the result of a significant increase in environmental standards that are unsustainable for diesel. i literally have no idea and am not a diesel guy or even a car guy.

To that extent, how sustainable are they for regular gasoline cars? are other manufacturers doing the same thing to skirt unrealistic regulations? I'm as pinko commie as they come but am always wary of unrealistic regulation (often fueled by partisan infighting). it not only affects large business but we the peeps who live among them. headline today was dow plunges over 200 points with fears over VW debocle. how this actually reasonably relates to thousands of different publicly traded companies in every industry is beyond me but my 401k doesn't care about reason.
Good point...

So some would argue we need bigger govt and more laws to monitor and enforce the unrealistic goals set by politicians pandering to their base...fascinating...
__________________
Atmsao
(according to my semi anonymous opinion)
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 09-22-2015, 12:00 PM
christian's Avatar
christian christian is online now
Epic=No Smiles
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by druptight View Post
Here's the interesting part for me - I've read a lot of people claiming that even though it was 40x above regulatory standards, our TDI's are still belching out way less crap than most cars on the road. This quote seems to refute that:
Yes, that's objectively false.
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 09-22-2015, 12:03 PM
christian's Avatar
christian christian is online now
Epic=No Smiles
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by cinema View Post
I wonder if the resulting computer code to bypass emission testing was the result of a significant increase in environmental standards that are unsustainable for diesel. i literally have no idea and am not a diesel guy or even a car guy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93legendti View Post
Good point...

So some would argue we need bigger govt and more laws to monitor and enforce the unrealistic goals set by politicians pandering to their base...fascinating...
It's not a good point. The cars pass the emission test when their exhaust plumbing is engaged. Ergo, it's possible for the cars to meet the emission requirements. You are engaged in strawman arguments, and it's clear you have little to no understanding of diesel emissions or emission standards.
Reply With Quote
  #254  
Old 09-22-2015, 12:04 PM
ftf ftf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by christian View Post
It's not a good point. The cars pass the emission test when their exhaust plumbing is engaged. Ergo, it's possible for the cars to meet the emission requirements. You are engaged in strawman arguments, and it's clear you have little to no understanding of diesel emissions or emission standards.
Heck even heavy duty trucks are belching out fewer emissions than the 4 cylinder in these VWs.
Reply With Quote
  #255  
Old 09-22-2015, 12:06 PM
93legendti 93legendti is offline
Adam/SerottaFan
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by christian View Post
It's not a good point. The cars pass the emission test when their exhaust plumbing is engaged. Ergo, it's possible for the cars to meet the emission requirements. You are engaged in strawman arguments, and it's clear you have little to no understanding of diesel emissions or emission standards.
Oh? You don't say.


Do you feel better now?
__________________
Atmsao
(according to my semi anonymous opinion)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
autoscam, boring threads


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.