#16
|
|||
|
|||
Considering almost no one can hold 400w for even a few minutes it’s probably a good idea
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I don't get how keeping a group together is easier with watts vs mph? I ride solo or with one other rider so I guess that part would not matter to me. When I ride solo I try and average 20mph and when I ride with my buddy he tells me what pace he is wanting to ride and adjust accordingly.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I can figure out what others are capable of, my father for example, I know what watts I need to hold so he can draft behind me without dropping him but more importantly keeping him in his endurance range. Last edited by Likes2ridefar; 02-08-2024 at 10:13 AM. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Wow, thanks for all the great info! I’m a numbers nerd - I love Strava for that info - so this sounds like it’s gonna add to my riding.
Gary Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It might seem counter-intuitive, but the best way to keep a paceline working together smoothly, especially if there are riders of varying ability levels, is if the rider on the front works a little less hard on the uphills than on the flats, and a little harder on the downhills than the flats. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
If you don't have a training plan or coach a PM is a nifty source of data, but is otherwise less than useful.
About the only worthwhile data you'll get is 'make sure easy days are easy' and 'make sure hard days are hard.' M |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I agree with others who have said that the primary benefit is in effort management. I've been training and racing endurance sports for over 3 decades, most of that with HR based training, was often able to hit my zones within a couple of BPM by feel - and I still think power data is one of the most valuable additions to my kit. Knowing my zones and living in a region full of rolling hills, on HR or perceived effort you're often putting out 50-100w more than you think at the bottom of a roller, cresting a hill, etc. It's only for a few seconds at a time, but cumulatively over hours of riding, it really adds up. Those efforts happen and are done way before it feels even the slightest bit hard or shows up on HR.
I don't think you need to be training or racing to find power data useful. Anyone who wants to ride longer more comfortably can benefit. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I find that the most important use for the pm is keeping myself just below threshold on long climbs so I don’t blow up a third of the way up.
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
nice thread, i've just added a couple of books to the reading list.
i've been "training" with no data to this point but soon want to incorporate HR and power. Quote:
__________________
IG |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
You need to actually learn your zones before you can really use it to gauge efforts and pace yourself.
Ride for a while with it and you might intuit where your zones are, but realistically you probably need to do some of the tests. Once you have that it is quite useful for controlling your efforts, especially on really long rides. That control of your efforts will make you faster straight away on a long enough ride. To actually improve stuff in an efficient way requires you to kind of remake how you do "training" rides if you don't already do interval training on a regular basis. If you already do intervals with heart rate it's not as big of a learning process, but you end up learning to pace different with power. Selecting exactly which intervals are going to be most beneficial is a learning process perhaps best assisted by a coach. It's easy to overdo it as well. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The charts are pretty much the same across most of the platforms but some vary the terms so that they look unique. I'd be happy to help in pm's if you have specific questions. I'm not an expert by any means but have been using it over several iterations. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I just used my power meter (actually Garmin power meter pedals) to pace a social/recovery ride for my club (COGS, or Cyclists of Greater Seattle). Based on experimentation with perceived effort, I used 100 watts for cruising on gently rolling surfaces and pedaling downhill; and 150 watts for climbing. Anything that couldn't be climbed at 150 watts I walked.
100 Watts corresponded to Zone 1 for me, and 150 watts to Zone 2. Our club's official guidelines for pacing are based on speed bands on level surfaces with no wind, an ideal case which is seldom available in Seattle. I'm revising the Ride Leader guidelines and looking for alternate pacing definitions that work in an area with rolling bike paths and short steep hills. In my own riding, I find the power meter approach is most useful for keeping recovery rides at a low pace, and controlling effort on long climbs. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
How fast were you going outputting 100w on a flat assuming no other significant variable like wind..
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Around 10mph.
Here's the RideWithGPS file with all the power data. https://ridewithgps.com/trips/145747838 |
|
|