Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2017, 05:43 PM
exapkib's Avatar
exapkib exapkib is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,164
How does one choose a handlebar in the internet age?

Here's my situation: I am building up my first carbon frame (a used Parlee!) and looking for the right set of bars. Having spent my time exclusively on steel frames so far, I'm much more well-versed in searching out suitable silver bars and posts than more modern looking finishing kit.

I have purchased a set of Easton EC70 SL3 bars from an online retailer. They got lost in the mail. I am at the point at which I can ask them to resend the bars or refund the money to buy something used.

What I know:

--I like a compact, non-ergo bar. I've been riding a Soma HWY 1 and Ritchey Classic bar on my other bikes. I really like the feel of the Ritchey bars. I also really like the Soma bars, though I think I bought them too wide. I don't like ergo bars.

My list:

Ritchey Classic
Easton EC70 SL3
Easton EC90 SLX3
3T Ergonova Pro or Team
Zipp SL SSR
Thomson Carbon

By question: beyond the aesthetic issues (shiny silver bars on otherwise black carbon frame) (is this as bad a faux pas as it feels like it is?), what am I missing by not buying one of the above bars? The drop/reach/shape appear to be very similar between them. The weight difference between the carbon and aluminum bars is obvious, but I'm not sure how important it is to me at this point.

Are the claimed 'damping effects' of using a carbon bar real? I'm not sure I'm the most perceptive cyclist in the world--too much time riding around on 'heavy' steel frames.

I don't intend this post to fan the carbon/aluminum handlebar debate generally, just looking to understand if there are compelling reasons to spend the money for a new handlebar, or if I should just go ride my bike.

Thanks!
__________________
Yamaguchi Team USA
Crumpton SL

Last edited by exapkib; 08-23-2017 at 06:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-23-2017, 05:54 PM
Clean39T Clean39T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 19,324
How does one choose a handlebar in the internet age?

I'll send you the EC90 for the cost of shipping - if you like it, pay me what you think is fair. If not, offer it back up on here for someone else to try...

I like the bars, I just ride narrower ones now.
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:00 PM
exapkib's Avatar
exapkib exapkib is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,164
That's hugely generous of you, and I may just take you up on the offer.

At the same time, it's also a learning experience for me--I figure we've got enough 'real world' experience in the membership of this forum to get a few votes on the pros and cons of using carbon in handlebars.
__________________
Yamaguchi Team USA
Crumpton SL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:08 PM
Clean39T Clean39T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 19,324
How does one choose a handlebar in the internet age?

Quote:
Originally Posted by exapkib View Post
That's hugely generous of you, and I may just take you up on the offer.



At the same time, it's also a learning experience for me--I figure we've got enough 'real world' experience in the membership of this forum to get a few votes on the pros and cons of using carbon in handlebars.

No worries, I've enjoyed your posts and they're just gathering dust...sometimes just trying is worth all the descriptions in the world...

But to answer your question, I can definitely feel a difference between carbon and aluminum, and ride both. And there's a big difference between different makers too, which can be felt for sure. Thick tape mutes some of the difference in vibration damping quality, but there's no hiding a wet-noodle if your big enough to flex it. And the rest is personal preference on shape. I've gravitated to liking compact bends and the huge M35 Deda setup. There's really no way to settle this other than trying a few and seeing what you think...which stinks with bars since they're $20 to ship...
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:13 PM
pdmtong's Avatar
pdmtong pdmtong is offline
v a n i l l a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,935
IMHO the reason for carbon bars is because they come in varying shapes - not the bend but the top cross-section shape - flat/teardrop, oval, round, fat, skinny...as well as transition to the bar and then ergo or round bend. of course most of us grew up/started with a traditional round cross-section...but given the choice, I like what carbon offers - check out the ritchey evo curve for example.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:18 PM
54ny77 54ny77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,989
count me among the "can't tell a damned bit difference" carbon vs. alu. handlebar & stem club.

on one bike, i had a high zoot ritchey carbon stem and easton carbon bar (the one with flat top, finger dimples and red on a good part of the bar). they came with the bike. one afternoon i was putting on new cables, tape and repositioning the levers. when i had it all set and was cinching down the stem clamp bolts slowly but surely (and in proper sequence), while still UNDER torque spec i heard a very faint crackling sound. thank goodness i didn't have the garage stereo on, or i'd have never heard it. backed it off and tried tightening again, it sounded like the faintest rice crispies.

didn't like that one bit. immediately pulled it off, swapped everything out for a pro vibe 7s traditional round bend compact aluminum bar, a pro vibe 7s aluminum stem that i had on hand, and presto. done. not once do i ever think or worry about carbon torque issues. ever. and frankly, the front end feels stiffer and better with that setup. it's dialed. no issues whatsoever with more or less fatigue, numbness, buzzyness, yadda yadda.

alloy bars & stems used for gazillion years, and......they're still quite good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:20 PM
simonov simonov is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 712
Can you post a photo of the Ritchey bars you like? Depending on which version, they may make a black anodized or carbon version of the same shape. Or if you like the old WCS Classic shallow drop bars Deda's Zero 100 Shallow is pretty much the same shape.

As for carbon, I like carbon bars, but nobody makes the shape I currently like in carbon so I ride aluminum on most of my bikes. I'd say shape trumps material. It's also worth noting that while the shape of the drops may look similar in the bars you list, they may have widely varying tops and ramps, which could change how they feel or where the hoods end up.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:23 PM
ntb1001's Avatar
ntb1001 ntb1001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,559
I have and use the 3T ergonova on 2 different bikes...one carbon, and one aluminum. I like both, although i tend to wrap my bars thick with extra tape so I probably can't properly tell the difference.

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:26 PM
nmrt nmrt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,898
For me going from an alloy to a carbon bar was a HUGE difference. Mind you, I could not feel the difference in riding over smooth flat roads at "normal" speeds. But since I live in CO, going downhill from high passes at high speeds and coming across bumps/irregularities on the road made my hand greatly fatigued on alloy bars. Switching to carbon was a great relief.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:35 PM
m4rk540 m4rk540 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 772
Deda Zero100s have the same reach and drop as the Somas; however, the Dedas have a more classic transition and work better for larger hands. If you're comfortable in the drops of the Soma, check out the Zipp SL 70s. Very similar shape, same drop but 5mm less reach.

Carbon fiber is not a good application for handlebars, IMO.

Last edited by m4rk540; 09-05-2017 at 06:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:39 PM
pdmtong's Avatar
pdmtong pdmtong is offline
v a n i l l a
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by simonov View Post
Can you post a photo of the Ritchey bars you like? Depending on which version, they may make a black anodized or carbon version of the same shape. Or if you like the old WCS Classic shallow drop bars Deda's Zero 100 Shallow is pretty much the same shape.

As for carbon, I like carbon bars, but nobody makes the shape I currently like in carbon so I ride aluminum on most of my bikes. I'd say shape trumps material. It's also worth noting that while the shape of the drops may look similar in the bars you list, they may have widely varying tops and ramps, which could change how they feel or where the hoods end up.
yes, shape trumps material. I have these in both carbon and alloy and no difference. love the ovalized flats so no palm dig from a sharper trailing edge when climbing. transition is flat to the hoods which I like for campy and sram (no idea on shimano). note since these have some flare, I size up to 44 while in most other bars I ride a 42.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2017, 06:43 PM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Ritchey makes those classic bars in black too.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:38 PM
exapkib's Avatar
exapkib exapkib is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,164
I appreciate the thoughtful replies here.

It's always encouraging to see that this forum seems to be made up of equal parts information and enabling.
__________________
Yamaguchi Team USA
Crumpton SL
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:41 PM
dustyrider dustyrider is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,998
Hwy one also comes in black. Which is where I may go...I'm in the same boat with indecision.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:43 PM
Mzilliox Mzilliox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Southern OR
Posts: 4,876
yes, carbon bars do help some. i had aluminum zipp bars on the zanconato which is already a stiff bike. my driveway is 3/4 mile of gravel, so its harsh on a race bike. I didn;t like the interaction with the campagnolo hoods no matter what i tried so i snagged some carbon bars for a deal. i swapped to the carbon easton something 70 compact bars, and not only did my hoods fit better on the bar itself, the dampening was noticeable immediately on the gravel drive with the same everything else including bar tape. nice bar.

so yeah, its real, and maybe worth it depending on the bike. I use alu bars on the Goodrich n Lavecaise because they are a bit more forgiving on the gravel already. and i beat up the Lavecaise on the gravel pretty hard sometimes so i prefer the aluminum.

and yes, they are lighter
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.