Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-10-2017, 11:25 PM
geordanh's Avatar
geordanh geordanh is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Coast
Posts: 1,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by vqdriver View Post
here's my geekhouse at 19.5
i can easily drop a pound (at least) if i go with a carbon fork instead of the segmented steel.

sweet!

Agreed on the speedvagen checking all the boxes. The motobecane looks pretty cool as the not $10,000 option
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-11-2017, 07:49 AM
happycampyer happycampyer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 4,364
Getting a road bike to weigh 16lbs isn't particularly hard (read: expensive) these days depending on the frame material. A bike designed for wider tires (33 - 34mm) and mid-reach brakes is going to be the closest to that target--the frame might be a little heavier, and the tires heavier, so now you're pushing 17lbs.

To add discs, a whole bunch of factors that affect weight come into play. The brakes themselves weigh more than caliper or canti brakes. But now the frame and fork need to be stiffer (and heavier) to deal with the stresses of the brakes. A carbon gravel or cross fork weighs more than a road fork. A tapered steerer requires a bigger headtube which as previously mentioned adds weight. Quick release or thru-axle? TA adds weight, but the market seems to have moved in the direction of TA.

So, there aren't a lot of places to "save" weight. One big one is to go with a carbon frame. But if one wants a metal frame, then the wheels become the last big variable. Carbon clincher disc wheels are lighter than their aluminum counterparts, but the result for an all-road or gravel build is typically a wheel that weighs about the same as a light aluminum clincher.

18lbs for a ti or steel all-road/gravel disc bike is pretty darn light.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-12-2017, 10:39 AM
jambee jambee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1,130
Love this thread.

I can also suggest a build around the Open U.P. If you use it with light 650B wheels (like the DT Swiss XR331), you can easy get your awesome off road gravel bike into the sum 8.3 kg...easily.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-12-2017, 11:28 AM
crankles crankles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 1,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by geordanh View Post
sweet!

Agreed on the speedvagen checking all the boxes. The motobecane looks pretty cool as the not $10,000 option
well...you didn't say anything about cost ;-)

These days, the build kit often outstrips the frame cost...at least steel-wise...for most custom builders.

example...Erik at alliance will build you his raceytubeset steel CX frame/fork for about $2600. The Ultegra Ui2 hydro build kit will run just north of $3k.

$5600 for a custom built, sub 19lb steel rig.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-12-2017, 12:04 PM
Russian bear Russian bear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 222
How about doing an aluminum frame and carbon fork? Everyone goes gaga over steel and smooth ride blah blah, but when you have 40mm tires on, does it really make a difference in the ride feel? Niner has the rlt in alu for instance, haven't checked the weight on it though. Trek has the 920 frameset etc.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-12-2017, 12:08 PM
jtbadge's Avatar
jtbadge jtbadge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russian bear View Post
How about doing an aluminum frame and carbon fork? Everyone goes gaga over steel and smooth ride blah blah, but when you have 40mm tires on, does it really make a difference in the ride feel? Niner has the rlt in alu for instance, haven't checked the weight on it though. Trek has the 920 frameset etc.
Alloy seems to be the answer. I really want to try out a Spooky Dune.

Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-12-2017, 12:10 PM
Formulasaab's Avatar
Formulasaab Formulasaab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington, DE USA
Posts: 740
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtbadge View Post
Alloy seems to be the answer. I really want to try out a Spooky Dune.





Lose .375 lb. with mud removal but leave mud for extra rad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
-STEFAN
BUY FROM YOUR LBS or from Paceline members
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-12-2017, 12:18 PM
thwart's Avatar
thwart thwart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wisco
Posts: 10,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by happycampyer View Post
18lbs for a ti or steel all-road/gravel disc bike is pretty darn light.
True, no doubt.

I have a path racer or 'gravel grinder' bike built around a non-disc Moots PsychloX, which with shorty strap-on plastic fenders and 35 mm tires/alloy clinchers weighs around 20 lbs.

Then again...

I haven't yet done any gravel challenge rides/races, but it seems that most of 'em are un-supported... so given you're probably carrying 4 or 5 lbs of water and food, obsessing about weight (as one might do on a road bike intended for a hilly ride) seems a little well, over the top. IMO.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg screenshot_312.jpg (130.8 KB, 671 views)
__________________
Old... and in the way.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-12-2017, 12:40 PM
noonan1970 noonan1970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,157
Mudville

The Mudville frameset I have for sale in the classifieds comes in right about 18.5 with mechanical discs, pedals, and a cage.

Last edited by noonan1970; 04-12-2017 at 12:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-12-2017, 12:52 PM
crankles crankles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 1,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russian bear View Post
How about doing an aluminum frame and carbon fork? Everyone goes gaga over steel and smooth ride blah blah, but when you have 40mm tires on, does it really make a difference in the ride feel? Niner has the rlt in alu for instance, haven't checked the weight on it though. Trek has the 920 frameset etc.
This is a reasonable point. I hate hate hate the ride of aluminum CX rigs on 33s. Rattles my fillings and the rear end never seems to stay stuck to the ground.

40-45mm tires though can hide a lot of ugly. With the added tire weight, aluminum might be the only way to hit a sub 19lbs gravel bike.

and cost less too.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 04-12-2017, 06:33 PM
oliver oliver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 101
I would get the Mason Bokeh if I was looking for a new bike and had money.

Alu frame, carbon fork, max tire size of 700Cx41 or larger if you get 650B, disc brakes, less than 20 lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-12-2017, 08:17 PM
ceolwulf's Avatar
ceolwulf ceolwulf is offline
なんでやねん
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: southern Manitoba
Posts: 1,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by crankles View Post
This is a reasonable point. I hate hate hate the ride of aluminum CX rigs on 33s. Rattles my fillings and the rear end never seems to stay stuck to the ground.

40-45mm tires though can hide a lot of ugly. With the added tire weight, aluminum might be the only way to hit a sub 19lbs gravel bike.

and cost less too.
My aluminum Masi CXR rides very well indeed, even on 32s but definitely on 40s, and weighs in around 18.5 built with Centaur/CX10. Cantis though.

(On good 25mm road tires it's actually the nicest riding "road" bike I've had. Something about that frame really works.)
__________________
明日は明日の風が吹く
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-12-2017, 10:45 PM
Russian bear Russian bear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by oliver View Post
I would get the Mason Bokeh if I was looking for a new bike and had money.

Alu frame, carbon fork, max tire size of 700Cx41 or larger if you get 650B, disc brakes, less than 20 lbs.
I was going to list this in my post too but I don't think they ship to the US. I'm really jazzed about that frameset.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-12-2017, 11:37 PM
Peter B Peter B is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sierra Foothills
Posts: 2,901
This one is 17.4 lbs sans water.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3486 (1).jpg (106.3 KB, 567 views)
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-13-2017, 02:10 AM
oliver oliver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russian bear View Post
I was going to list this in my post too but I don't think they ship to the US. I'm really jazzed about that frameset.
Ah I didn't realize they don't (or might not ship) to the US. My friend just got one and he's pretty stoked to ride it on Dirty Reiver.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.