|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Now, having said that... if you ride the forest service roads, things open up in an amazing way. Many many many more miles of dirt/gravel/off-roading than road riding. Didn't live in Sedona. Visited a few times, but was running more than riding back then HTH M |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Though admittedly,... it does get a bit warm in the summer.
__________________
Old'n'Slow |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Not Charlotte.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know about your mid-Atlantic choices, but Denver sounds like it meets the vast majority of your presented criteria. The cycling in Colorado is top notch.
Quote:
Quote:
Questionable. Denver attracts transplants from both coasts as well as from Texas. It's colder, to be sure, but subjectively doesn't feel worse due to the relative lack of humidity. Probably more days of sunshine in a year. In my experience, snow tends to melt fairly quickly; accumulation doesn't linger, and there isn't a ton of salt dumped on the road. These things impact one's perception of winter. Check (especially if you decide to live downtown, or in nearby Boulder).
__________________
Pedalroom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
+1 to all that, which is why I'm trying to get my wife and me back to the Front Range...if NorCal doesn't snag us first...still up in the air there, but if the job doesn't come through, it's all eyes on Coloradeee Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Nothern Oregon
Northern Oregon Portland, Bend all gets you in some nice riding
Bend does have a winter Northern CA works also Once out of high cost area like the SF bay area works like Chico |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Portland is good if you want to tool around the city, or if you want to race cross, but until you get way out of the city, or drive out to the good rides and endless gravel, the roads are pretty tough for roadies - traffic, rain, no bike lanes, bad surfaces, etc. all complicate things - it's not what it was 20yrs ago when riding up in the hills close to town was rural. It all depends on what you're benchmarking to though. I've lived in Boulder, so I have pretty high standards for what a "good" cycling city is... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's not the homeless in Seattle that are the issue - it's a big city that has gotten really expensive and working/service class folks are struggling to say the least, mostly invisibly in the close-in suburbs of Kent, Renton, etc. - what sucks about Seattle (and Portland) are the feral, professional homeless who have completely abrogated their role in the social contract and are only interested in drugs and crime. Google "the jungle Seattle". For a cyclist, this matters. The feral population ends up living in tent encampments along cycling trails, in the woods, in areas we commute through - and that makes for a very unsafe situation. There have been rapes and random attacks in Portland on cyclists and runners. Parts of the city are no-go zones at this point - parts that used to be what made Portland a great place to live. Now you can't go anywhere close to downtown without finding needles, feces, and trash. I understand the laws of dependent origination that led these people to where they are today, and I donate to causes trying to help them, but I still have to think about my safety and that of my family/friends. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Io non posso vivere senza la mia strada e la mia bici -- DP |
|
|