Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:06 PM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrogulja View Post
Trying to understand from collective here what is the problem with SRAM??

I raced 2 seasons of CX races on SRAM components and havent had a single failure. I know many SRAM guys (people who work for SRAM) and guys who race their stuff.

Personally, I rode my CX bike all summer long on road tires and put over 70000k on it during the summer. Everything works like it should.

Had Shimano ultegra and Campy Record before that.

What are your experiences?
I was once on a Thursday night group ride where three right Force shifters all failed for their respective riders. I lent a hand at a buddy's shop and saw enough blown apart SRAM stuff that wasn't that old.

Its lightweight, sure, but doesn't last in my experience.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:16 PM
mrogulja mrogulja is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
Wow - good to hear, guess I was lucky.

So where does the problem stem from? Is it engineering or quality control?
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:22 PM
makoti makoti is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NoVa
Posts: 6,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post

Rather walk.
Good thing, because with Sram, you likely will be. ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:24 PM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrogulja View Post
Wow - good to hear, guess I was lucky.

So where does the problem stem from? Is it engineering or quality control?
Engineering/design, the desire to be lightest, the desire to be first, oftimes un monitored manufacturers not local(as in Asia-no this isn't a shot at Asian quality). When sram came out with 10s MTB stuff, shimano nodded, and then designed a much nicer, much more sophisticated 10s MTB lineup. Place 10s MTB any part next to each other and the shimano stuff exudes quality in design and manufacturing. sram stuff does not. Same for the road stuff, only more so.

Arrogance to boot, from some of the spam big boys, as if their ___ doesn't stink.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:25 PM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,038
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrogulja View Post
Wow - good to hear, guess I was lucky.

So where does the problem stem from? Is it engineering or quality control?
Good one, right above.

oppps dupe, sorry-
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:29 PM
mrogulja mrogulja is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe View Post
Engineering/design, the desire to be lightest, the desire to be first, oftimes un monitored manufacturers not local(as in Asia-no this isn't a shot at Asian quality). When sram came out with 10s MTB stuff, shimano nodded, and then designed a much nicer, much more sophisticated 10s MTB lineup. Place 10s MTB any part next to each other and the shimano stuff exudes quality in design and manufacturing. sram stuff does not. Same for the road stuff, only more so.

Arrogance to boot, from some of the spam big boys, as if their ___ doesn't stink.
point taken
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:38 PM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrogulja View Post
Wow - good to hear, guess I was lucky.

So where does the problem stem from? Is it engineering or quality control?
I've always had the sense they're not afraid to let their customers be their beta testers.

Not that Shimano and Campy haven't had their mis-steps in their own time. But SRAM stuff seems to break, a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:45 PM
Anarchist Anarchist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrogulja View Post
Trying to understand from collective here what is the problem with SRAM??

I raced 2 seasons of CX races on SRAM components and havent had a single failure. I know many SRAM guys (people who work for SRAM) and guys who race their stuff.

Personally, I rode my CX bike all summer long on road tires and put over 70000k on it during the summer. Everything works like it should.

Had Shimano ultegra and Campy Record before that.

What are your experiences?
Did you ever sleep?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-26-2015, 02:55 PM
unterhausen unterhausen is offline
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,950
I guess the SRAM stuff just fails quicker than the Shimano STi, because I know people that warrantied their Shimano levers a couple of times and then were told they were out of luck. Maybe electronic shifting will save SRAM from their underweight shifters
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 01-26-2015, 03:11 PM
Dead Man's Avatar
Dead Man Dead Man is offline
The B!
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,596
Retro-grouching aside, I think SRAMs market is totally different than Campagnolo's. SRAM for light weight, campy for style or tradition. Or some variation like that.

This isn't unusual in the material world- there are plenty of manufactures in lots of industries that produce the lightest product possible, at a known durability disadvantage. Alpine climbing equipment comes to mind first- yea, you can buy a tent or jacket that will last years of abuse, or you can pay twice as much for something that'll last half the time or less (maybe even one climb) but weighs next to nothing
__________________
where are we going, and why am i in this handbasket?

Last edited by Dead Man; 01-26-2015 at 03:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 01-26-2015, 03:11 PM
mrogulja mrogulja is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarchist View Post
Did you ever sleep?
ooooops....7000km
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 01-26-2015, 03:11 PM
saab2000's Avatar
saab2000 saab2000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,525
After years of only Campagnolo I was given a bike to ride at a New England dirt road ride. Not D2R2. Anyway, I wanted to not like it. But it was terrific. It took all of about 2 miles to get used to it.

I now own 2 bikes with Dura Ace 9000 components and I think they're great.

It's OK to have change in your life.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 01-31-2015, 10:28 PM
elong8 elong8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,239
Shimophobia...I got it.

I confronted this fear head on with my first touring build. I wanted something inexpensive, but fairly reliable; something I could possibly kinda trash and not feel guilty. So I went with Ultegra. Working out pretty well, so I restored an old Serotta frame with 6400. Also pretty cool. But nothing more than a passing fancy. I'll keep it Italian when I'm building something permanent.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 01-31-2015, 11:06 PM
Dead Man's Avatar
Dead Man Dead Man is offline
The B!
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,596
I am this way with Dodge.... It doesn't seem to matter how far removed they are from the crappy cars they put out when I was a kid- I will never own or drive a Dodge.
__________________
where are we going, and why am i in this handbasket?
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 02-01-2015, 05:37 AM
saab2000's Avatar
saab2000 saab2000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,525
The difference is that Shimano has rarely marketed junk among their mainstream products.

For at least 30 years now Shimano has been producing high quality that are still in use today.

I only say 30 years because it was really pretty rare stuff before that but it was still high quality.

My mother has a town bike that she got about 20 years ago. A friend of mine had a shop then and I decided that it would be a good idea to take the bike and do a complete overhaul of the whole thing before she got many miles on it. That included shortening the cables to the right length, lubing the cables, repacking the hubs (which probably aren't Shimano, but I don't know. Anyway, they're smooth as silk today), etc.

She really doesn't ride anymore because of where she lives but every once in a while I get on the bike and pump up the tires. It's perfect. All gear shifts are indexed perfectly and the brakes are still fine. She rode it a lot the first 15 years she had it, so it's not like it's just been sitting.

I'm agnostic now on the topic of groupsets..... I used to be a diehard Campagnolo guy. No more. They're all good when set up properly, maintained properly and used properly. I'm not a fan of the Sram logos and graphics but even that stuff is probably pretty good when installed and used properly.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.