#16
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that certain je ne sais quoi. --Peter Schickele |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
To me, Campagnolo is the beautiful girlfriend I just can't seem to stay away. One on hand, the components are just beautiful. I like the aesthetics of Campy shifters, FD, cassettes, RD, cranksets, hell, the chains look more elegant. But....I don't like the crankset set-up. The retaining clip is a bit of a pain relative to shimano's system. While I love the ultra-torque hirth joint system, I hate having the bearings installed on the crank arms and am not a fan of the wavy washer preloading the bearings. The bearings seem to last not quite as long as super cheap Tiagra bottom brackets from Shimano. I also do not like their hidden 135bcd and 110/112bcd crank arms.
I also don't like that Campy went carbon (material and aesthetics) everything. Bring back the beautiful silver alloy groupsets! I have Shimano cranksets (and cassettes, full disclosure) on otherwise Campagnolo builds. Even though I think the hollowtech II cranksets are pretty ugly. For one, I think their chainrings shift the smoothest. Second, Campagnolo's bearings are not sealed quite as well, so I have to be more pro-active especially after particularly wet rides in checking for water seeping into the bottom bracket and bearings. Is there some benefit to having the bearings on the crank arm spindles that I am not aware of? I think I have more campagnolo specific tools than I do general tools. For my money, the Shimano's 7700 group was probably the greatest groupset I've ever ridden. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I believe the OP's original post was in jest. If you read it and thinks it's "go time" ......then you need to cut down on your monday AM coffee intake.
__________________
Mr. Bob Dobalina Last edited by firerescuefin; 01-26-2015 at 09:40 AM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
in 50+ years of riding, I've never had a single Campy bit on a bike.
it bothers me not. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
But yer in Texas
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels Qui Si Parla Campagnolo |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
It's all fun and games until someone puts an eye out... |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Obviously a very HIGH threshold for bother there.
__________________
It's all fun and games until someone puts an eye out... |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I have Campy on both of my bikes but have Shimano shoes on my feet. They just seem to fit best. Tried many other brands but am doomed to wear them it appears.
Tim |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And I will say that the Rival Cranks are MUCH better looking than Shimanos. Shimano cranks remind me of this:
__________________
It's all fun and games until someone puts an eye out... |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Finally!!! A Shimano vs Campy thread. tubulars vs clinchers? And steel bikes cant be raced. They are too slow.
__________________
www.performancesci.com - Performance through science |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Funny the timing of your post. I am literally starting to put my Gravelbike together today. First Shimano build in 15 years. I weighed the options and it just made more sense for this bike. Really wanted to do Chorus (and could have)...but went with 9000 instead.
__________________
Mr. Bob Dobalina |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
but, I've lived in other places...Oregon, Colorado, Montana...
no Campy there either... |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
....and you walked uphill both ways in the blowing snow to school...barefoot.
__________________
Mr. Bob Dobalina |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Also, have sram on my mtn bike and it works just fine. Used the entire line of sram road stuff too, but just think that shimano and campy work better (also sram is a huge pita to work on). I am replacing the avid pos brakes on the mtn bike with some xt's though. |
|
|