Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2016, 11:04 AM
Clydesdale's Avatar
Clydesdale Clydesdale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Spirit Lake, IA
Posts: 883
Cannondale EVO - feedback

Looking to add a road bike to the stable and have had my eye on a c'dale. Can anyone tell what they like/don't like about the evo and if the Hi-mod is appreciably "better."

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2016, 11:08 AM
nate2351 nate2351 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 524
They ride very well, and are super light. My only qualm was I wanted a steeper HT angle. The handling is very predictable but I like "flicky" bikes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2016, 11:35 AM
Cicli Cicli is offline
Lanterne rouge
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Oro Valley Az.
Posts: 7,194
I loved mine. It fit well and rode well. The end was when I ran into issues with some of the larger 25mm tires in the rear. If I cant comfortably run a 25-27mm tire it goes on the chopping block.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2016, 11:43 AM
beeatnik beeatnik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,897
Clyde, how much do you weigh?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2016, 11:45 AM
Clydesdale's Avatar
Clydesdale Clydesdale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Spirit Lake, IA
Posts: 883
Weight

I bounce between 210 and 225 depending on time of year and diet/discipline.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2016, 11:48 AM
beeatnik beeatnik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,897
Do you care about "power transfer" or "stiffness" on a carbon bike?

Last edited by beeatnik; 02-03-2016 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-2016, 12:03 PM
Gummee Gummee is offline
Old, Fat & Slow
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NoVA for now
Posts: 6,473
Rode a friend's EVO. Nice riding bike overall.

Bikes are easy to move on if you decide you don't like it. Try it out and see!

M
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2016, 12:06 PM
Clydesdale's Avatar
Clydesdale Clydesdale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Spirit Lake, IA
Posts: 883
Maybe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beeatnik View Post
Do you care about "power transfer" or "stiffness" on a carbon bike?
Not really, I like a solid feeling through the bb and stays, but I don't stand a whole lot so the "stiffness" thing is less important to me than overall feel and handling. The EVO intrigues me, the reviews are good, and the prices on used ones seem reasonable so I'm curious.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2016, 12:07 PM
-dustin -dustin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 756
They're boring. Uninspiring.

But, they do everything well.

If you've never had a carbon wonder bike, it'll blow you away.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-2016, 12:11 PM
beeatnik beeatnik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,897
I rode my HM Evo most when I was in the high 140s/low 150s and the frame felt a little soft. I thought the handling was pretty telepathic; best I've experienced on a road bike in tight cornering. If you're looking at a first generation EVO, the price to performance ratio is unbeatable on the non HM frames and probably a better frame for a 2 buck plus rider. If you're thinking 2016 Evo, the HM may be fine as the BB is now BB30+ and beefier. Check this out:

http://www.giantbicycledealers.com/i...aunchbooks.pdf

http://www.twowheelscycles.com/giant...meTestData.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-03-2016, 12:31 PM
Davist's Avatar
Davist Davist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,600
have one, like it a lot, moved up from CAAD10. I have the "regular" model, it's plenty light and stiff for me. NEW ('16) versions have room for wider tires, mine ('14) has trouble with Archetypes (23mm rims) and Michelin 25s in the back. Conti 4k seems ok in 25 so far..

I'm 185-190, have a buddy at 210 who rides same one all the time, good bikes.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-03-2016, 12:40 PM
pro12tc pro12tc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 41
It's the best carbon bike I've owned. Very solid/telepathic handling. The Speed Save "micro-suspension" really does work.

I moved from a Specialized Tarmac to the EVO and it was a revelation. Much more comfortable and stable than the Tarmac (to me).

It does have a longer top tube than the Tarmac so it may be a bit more "stretched out".

I only ride 25's and have not had any problems with fit. Conti GP4000's, Maxxis Padrones, and Mavic GripLink/PowerLink all fit with no issues.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-03-2016, 01:00 PM
bcroslin bcroslin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,132
I've been riding a 2014 Hi-Mod for almost a year now and I love it. Handling is super predictable and it's about as comfortable as a stiff, race bike can be. Headtube isn't too tall or too short and the rear triangle stays planted under power. IMO Cannondale is sort of like Colnago in that they don't mess around with a tried and true design. There are definitely sexier bikes on the market that boast aero lines and proprietary doo-dads but the beauty of the Evo is that it's about as straight forward and unpretentious as you can get. Want integrated everything and internal cables - an EVO is the wrong bike. It's almost quaint these days that the only proprietary piece of the bike is the BB30 bottom bracket that the rest of the industry has adapted to the point that it's not really proprietary anymore. And if you hate press fit BB's you can simply install a Praxis adapter like I did and no more BB/PF 30. The 2016 Hi-Mod has a few improvements here and there but not so many that a 2014/15 isn't worth looking at. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but the 2016 non-Hi-Mod Evo is the same as the older 2014/15 Hi-Mod?

Anyway, bottom line, great bike and I highly recommend it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-03-2016, 01:02 PM
beeatnik beeatnik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcroslin View Post
IMO Cannondale is sort of like Colnago in that they don't mess around with a tried and true design.

Anyway, bottom line, great bike and I highly recommend it.
This
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-03-2016, 03:26 PM
11.4 11.4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,465
Yeah. And I hate to say it, but I'm riding a 2015 CAAD10 Ultegra more than I'm riding a Dura Ace Moots. It's just a nice, nice, ride. I got the CAAD as a winter ride where I didn't want to invest in the SuperSix Evo HiMod, but that Moots is starting to smell the auction block ahead. I keep test riding the Evo and the Evo HiMod for 2016, plus the 2015 HiMod, and really really like the feeling. I'd go for the HiMod because in sprints it feels a bit more responsive, though I can't say I'm really any faster on it. Just feels like you always wanted a carbon frame to ride. The 2016 is discernibly more comfortable than the 2015 and seems to be a little stiffer, though that's subjective. Certainly the 2016 has more tire clearances, which I like. I love custom bikes, but this one is really pretty cool.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.