Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:07 PM
CaptStash's Avatar
CaptStash CaptStash is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,786
The latest reports indicate that the McCain suffered a steering casualty which likely caused the collision. With that said, there is still no excuse. A vessel has multiple steering systems so unless the casualty was catastrophic (which it wasn't as the ship was able to regain steering shortly after - or maybe before - the collision), personnel should have been able to switch over quickly. The investigation should be interesting. This accident appears to have little in common with the issues surrounding the Fitzgerald and the ACX Crystal.

As to all the talk on the reliance on technology, I don't think that that is the problem. I think the core issue is a lack of functional seamanship from the NAVY's officers, and an inability to operate successfully effectively and safely in peacetime conditions based on the way the rest of he world operates at sea.

There has been a lot of talk about how the NAVY does not have a "Deck Officer" track. Basically, the guys on the bridge in U.S. NAVY ships have barely a shadow of the training and experience that the average Third Mate on a Liberian flagged cargo ship has. And it is even worse in a NAVY engine room.

CaptStash....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:15 PM
bicycletricycle's Avatar
bicycletricycle bicycletricycle is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: RI & CT
Posts: 9,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptStash View Post
The latest reports indicate that the McCain suffered a steering casualty which likely caused the collision. With that said, there is still no excuse. A vessel has multiple steering systems so unless the casualty was catastrophic (which it wasn't as the ship was able to regain steering shortly after - or maybe before - the collision), personnel should have been able to switch over quickly. The investigation should be interesting. This accident appears to have little in common with the issues surrounding the Fitzgerald and the ACX Crystal.

As to all the talk on the reliance on technology, I don't think that that is the problem. I think the core issue is a lack of functional seamanship from the NAVY's officers, and an inability to operate successfully effectively and safely in peacetime conditions based on the way the rest of he world operates at sea.

There has been a lot of talk about how the NAVY does not have a "Deck Officer" track. Basically, the guys on the bridge in U.S. NAVY ships have barely a shadow of the training and experience that the average Third Mate on a Liberian flagged cargo ship has. And it is even worse in a NAVY engine room.

CaptStash....
I had a friend who was an officer in the CBs. He was the boss of a whole bunch of people who knew 10 times more about what they were doing than him. All they did was drive tractors around and build stuff so it didn't seem like that big of a problem, seems like a bad situatuation when mapped onto a big ship though.
__________________
please don't take anything I say personally, I am an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:17 PM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptStash View Post
The latest reports indicate that the McCain suffered a steering casualty which likely caused the collision. With that said, there is still no excuse. A vessel has multiple steering systems so unless the casualty was catastrophic (which it wasn't as the ship was able to regain steering shortly after - or maybe before - the collision), personnel should have been able to switch over quickly. The investigation should be interesting. This accident appears to have little in common with the issues surrounding the Fitzgerald and the ACX Crystal.

As to all the talk on the reliance on technology, I don't think that that is the problem. I think the core issue is a lack of functional seamanship from the NAVY's officers, and an inability to operate successfully effectively and safely in peacetime conditions based on the way the rest of he world operates at sea.

There has been a lot of talk about how the NAVY does not have a "Deck Officer" track. Basically, the guys on the bridge in U.S. NAVY ships have barely a shadow of the training and experience that the average Third Mate on a Liberian flagged cargo ship has. And it is even worse in a NAVY engine room.

CaptStash....
Com7thFleet relieved...I agree...since USN line officers have to be versed in all departments, often just barely adequate in them. Tours in Ops, weapons, navigation, engineering, and all must be OOD qualed. Not sure who does the training. But aren't USN engineering officers EDO(Engineering Duty Officers)...

But no training in how to do ground job, in aviation. You learn 'under fire', OJT. Nothing really formal. Think that applies to the USN black shoes.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-23-2017, 01:53 PM
dddd dddd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,207
I'm thinking back to when a certain Chinese embassy got a bomb dropped on it "by accident"...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-12-2017, 06:14 AM
BdaGhisallo's Avatar
BdaGhisallo BdaGhisallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 2,935
http://inmilitary.com/real-reason-us...chant-vessels/

Interesting interview on the issues the Navy is facing.
__________________
"Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." - Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 09-12-2017, 06:33 AM
weisan's Avatar
weisan weisan is online now
ZhugeLiang
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Back in Austin, Texas
Posts: 17,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by BdaGhisallo View Post
http://inmilitary.com/real-reason-us...chant-vessels/

Interesting interview on the issues the Navy is facing.
.
Quote:
while it might be convenient or popular to string some kind of conspiracy theory, the mistakes made were all simple things: basic ship handling, navigation and seamanship stuff. Destroyers do not get run down by merchants; they are faster and much more maneuverable. No, they were not hacked; they were not run down on purpose. They just were asleep at the wheel.
Quote:
Navy has a very difficult issue transforming. Since it is capital-heavy, it needs to do more to bring down shipbuilding costs, while at the same time work assiduously to transform our personnel into distributed nodes with authority, that is transforming the personnel force. That is a tall order and it takes people not only with leadership skills but also imagination and vision, which is a commodity in short supply.
__________________
🏻*
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-13-2017, 06:47 PM
CaptStash's Avatar
CaptStash CaptStash is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,786
Meh. The guy interviewed seemed to lay too much of the failures on gender equality raining without simply stating that the Navy doesn't straight out train for or value seamanship.

CaptStash....
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-02-2017, 01:18 PM
BdaGhisallo's Avatar
BdaGhisallo BdaGhisallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 2,935
https://arstechnica.com/information-...-ui-confusion/

Interesting findings if this is indeed the scenario at play.
__________________
"Progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." - Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-02-2017, 02:29 PM
berserk87's Avatar
berserk87 berserk87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Plainfield, Indiana
Posts: 1,888
That doesn't explain all of the other protocols that were not employed prior to the collisions.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-03-2017, 06:11 AM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is offline
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptStash View Post
Meh. The guy interviewed seemed to lay too much of the failures on gender equality raining without simply stating that the Navy doesn't straight out train for or value seamanship.

CaptStash....
Agree...leadership/ship command in the USN just isn't long term, unlike the merchant services. Ship's officers 'train' in a variety of departments, all are 'OOD' qualified but there's no position of 'professional OOD(Officer Of the Deck)..Even the CO, often arriving as CO, not a term as Executive officer first, has his hands full and altho 'qualified', isn't a experienced ships commanding officer..something the merchant services have in spades..professional ship Masters.

PLUS USN ship tours are relatively short(3 years) and deployments aren't constant..a month or so of 'workups', a 6-7 deployment and then back into port, often for 12 months or so. Once the person has his 'sea duty', often 3 or more years of 'shore duty', not at sea at all.

Merchant ships are 'haze gray and underway' all the time..

BUT, these ships are very maneuverable, have a ton of sensors, the bridge watch and CO just gooned it up.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-03-2017, 06:39 PM
sg8357 sg8357 is offline
Forward the Foundation
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Highland Heights, Kehn-Tuck-ee
Posts: 2,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptStash View Post
Meh. The guy interviewed seemed to lay too much of the failures on gender equality raining without simply stating that the Navy doesn't straight out train for or value seamanship.

CaptStash....

If you haunt the Naval blogs and USNI, there is a constant complaint
about diversity, green, humanitarian aid and other social issues
taking up too much time, crowding out "warrior" and peer warfare issues.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-23-2019, 08:05 AM
pbarry pbarry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,379
Article/Podcast on the Collision

https://www.npr.org/2019/04/22/71590...n-the-u-s-navy

Quote:
This is FRESH AIR. I'm Dave Davies in for Terry Gross. In the early morning darkness of June 17, 2017, the Navy destroyer USS Fitzgerald collided with a cargo ship in the South China Sea. The much larger cargo vessel ripped a huge hole in the Fitzgerald, killing seven sailors. Two months later, another destroyer, the USS John S. McCain, collided with another cargo ship leaving 10 more sailors dead.

Our guest, veteran journalist T. Christian Miller, is part of an investigative team at the online news site ProPublica that looked into the crashes and problems with Navy operations that may have contributed to them. The reporters found that ships in the Seventh Fleet were chronically understaffed and that crews were often exhausted, poorly trained, and working with outdated or poorly maintained equipment and software. They also found Navy commanders had flagged the problems for years, but little was done to address them.

Last edited by pbarry; 04-23-2019 at 09:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.