Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 05-22-2017, 09:17 AM
chiasticon chiasticon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: northeast ohio
Posts: 3,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by JStonebarger View Post
I have rolled Challenge clinchers on more than one occasion, but in pretty extreme circumstances. IMO it's worth the risk.
I've done this. I was in first place at the time. race over. that's the point where I decided to get tubulars. haven't looked back.

IMHO, tubeless is a great option for practice and hitting singletrack on your cx bike, but is not ideal for racing. tubulars just aren't that difficult to deal with, really. but I get it, if you're only going to do a couple races, it's not worth the expense and hassle. but if you're racing every weekend all season long and taking it pretty seriously, tubulars are the way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-22-2017, 09:27 AM
JStonebarger JStonebarger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Iowa City, IA
Posts: 618
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiasticon View Post
... tubulars just aren't that difficult to deal with, really. but I get it, if you're only going to do a couple races, it's not worth the expense and hassle. but if you're racing every weekend all season long and taking it pretty seriously, tubulars are the way to go.
Cyclocross is my main passion anymore. 20+ races a year. I build my own wheels for it, and have a pair of tubulars mounted and ready. With similar tires mounted (in this case, Challenge Grifo XS) I can't tell the difference.

I still opt for clinchers more often than not. Especially as I'm a big fan of changing up tread for the course/conditions. With six treads to choose from I'll keep my options open.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-22-2017, 09:35 AM
chiasticon chiasticon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: northeast ohio
Posts: 3,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by JStonebarger View Post
Cyclocross is my main passion anymore. 20+ races a year. I build my own wheels for it, and have a pair of tubulars mounted and ready. With similar tires mounted (in this case, Challenge Grifo XS) I can't tell the difference.

I still opt for clinchers more often than not. Especially as I'm a big fan of changing up tread for the course/conditions. With six treads to choose from I'll keep my options open.
I can't tell a difference between the two when riding at similar pressures and with latex tubes in, yeah. except the point where the clinchers come off the rims and I'm not riding any more, then I can tell the difference

anyway, that's great they're working for you. didn't for me. I'm happy with having multiple tubular options now.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-22-2017, 07:44 PM
yashcha yashcha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 865
Thanks guys, always great input here.

I am going to get a set of non tubeless MXP's for some racing this fall here in Beijing, and when I get back to the US and can get my hands on tubeless equipment, I will upgrade to the tubeless version of the MXP.

Just picked up a pair of the MXP's for $50 shipped. Looking forward to testing these out.

Last edited by yashcha; 05-22-2017 at 09:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-22-2017, 08:11 PM
Britishbane Britishbane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NOVA
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by zank View Post
Drop me a line. I've been running the hed/mxp combo for a couple of seasons.
I'm scandalized! Zank racing cross on non-tubulars.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-23-2017, 05:37 AM
zank's Avatar
zank zank is offline
Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sutton, MA
Posts: 1,816
With three toddlers, gluing tires is at the bottom of my list of ways I want to spend my time. After spending time on CX tubeless, I don't think the gap is anywhere near 10%. I run mine at 20-22 psi. I can change tires at the venue. I can out-corner guys on tubs and guys on clinchers with butyl tubes can out-corner me. It primarily depends on skill, nerve, and getting to know your equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-23-2017, 08:09 AM
superbowlpats's Avatar
superbowlpats superbowlpats is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Fairhaven, MA
Posts: 1,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by zank View Post
It primarily depends on skill, nerve, and getting to know your equipment.
I hate it when someone speaks the truth
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-08-2017, 06:45 PM
yashcha yashcha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 865
Finally got the Clement MXP mounted and tested. Running about 35 psi to start.

My other clincher experience was with michelin mud pro, which I really hated. The profiles on the clements seem more round, and the tread surface feels really fast, even on pavement.

I am also trying out the 1X this year. Knocked almost 1.5 pounds off the bike.
Excited to try these out this weekend on my practice cross course.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_8840.jpg (58.1 KB, 47 views)

Last edited by yashcha; 06-08-2017 at 06:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-08-2017, 06:49 PM
zank's Avatar
zank zank is offline
Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sutton, MA
Posts: 1,816
Tubeless?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-08-2017, 07:13 PM
yashcha yashcha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by zank View Post
Tubeless?
These are clinchers. I am having trouble sourcing tubeless materials here in China so I will get tubeless set up when I am stateside.

When I took off the front derailluer and the chain catcher, all this paint fell off. I must be more vigilant next time.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-08-2017, 07:16 PM
zank's Avatar
zank zank is offline
Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sutton, MA
Posts: 1,816
Where do you think that weight savings came from? Paint is heavy.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-08-2017, 07:18 PM
yashcha yashcha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally Posted by zank View Post
Where do you think that weight savings came from? Paint is heavy.
Truth. I had read some interesting article about rim weight and how it went from 440 grams to 420 grams by the end of it's life cycle!

But the paint is so dappah.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-08-2017, 07:52 PM
kppolich's Avatar
kppolich kppolich is offline
SageOfMilwaukee
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 5,564
For me: Stans alpha 340, Vitoria latex, and schwalbe Racing Ralph tires. Usually run at 30 front, 35 rear for races. No flats ever, incredibly light.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.