#1681
|
|||
|
|||
That's how I read it: that the courts, in conjunction with CARB and EPA, will adjudicate the final settlement rather than allowing VW to seek a deal directly with consumers. Which is not to say that a deal -- perhaps negotiated by Feinberg -- with consumers can't be part of the final settlement. But again, even after reading the entire transcript, I don't know exactly how to parse it.
|
#1682
|
||||
|
||||
summary from Car and Driver
May be of interest to those individuals who want to get a summary of the story: http://blog.caranddriver.com/everyth...sions-scandal/
|
#1683
|
|||
|
|||
CEO of Volkswagen's American unit to depart
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/09/vws-a...e-company.html
"Effective immediately" Let the speculation begin...was he one of the 16 being investigated by the Germans...maybe his was one of the signatures that approved the software...or maybe we can blame it on the "six sygma" black belts... |
#1684
|
|||
|
|||
#1685
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#1686
|
|||
|
|||
He got future endeavored
Happens a lot with the six sygma guys Quote:
|
#1687
|
||||
|
||||
No way. Michael Horn got the parachute because he put the customers and the dealer network ahead of the company. He was the face of VW when he told the world "we screwed up". He devised the Goodwill plan for the US. Now Europe is pissed that they didn't get their piece of cake, and VW corporate increasingly appears to be focused on survival, not customer and dealer retention in the US. Every perplexing move they have made in the last few months has gone against the image Michael Horn portrayed. I'm sure that the departure was mutual.
|
#1688
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#1689
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#1690
|
|||
|
|||
The computer will be reflashed to accomplish something, we will be on our merry way. Diesel sales will no longer exist in the States, hybrid technology will replace.
Last edited by Cat3roadracer; 03-10-2016 at 04:22 PM. Reason: Sp |
#1691
|
||||
|
||||
plug in electrics will rule the day, and people in san francisco can pretend that coal pollution at the power plant is better than diesel in a passenger car.
|
#1692
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
When considering total lifetime carbon impacts, multiple factors come into play, such as point source vs. non-point source pollution generation and capture, increased natural gas and renewable energy sources into electrical grid, annual miles driven and lifespan of the vehicle etc. But, in your example of California, natural gas is the primary source powering the electrical grid (coal is < 5%) and the average miles driven per passenger vehicle are high. All in all, EVs are quite a bit more environmentally friendly and have less impact on human health than a diesel car.
__________________
Choices for Gorge riding: wind or climbs. Pick two. |
#1693
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#1694
|
||||
|
||||
I get the impression that you are not interested in an informed discussion about this. There is ample research available showing that from a carbon standpoint, in most circumstances, EVs are preferable to petrol fueled passenger vehicles. This doesn't even include the widespread health impacts.
I'm choosing not to continue this thread with someone choosing to be deliberately obtuse. I'm happy to have a non-snarky conversation with any mature forumites.
__________________
Choices for Gorge riding: wind or climbs. Pick two. |
#1695
|
||||
|
||||
well, for example, 35% of power in oregon, where you're living, is from coal. People buy diesel vehicles all over the country, and for most of the country, coal is king. Plug in electric cars pollute more than any modern combustion engine, they just do so where you can't see the tailpipe.
|
Tags |
autoscam, boring threads |
|
|