Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

View Poll Results: Which do you prefer for a modern lugged frame?
Sloping 32 20.38%
Level 125 79.62%
Voters: 157. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2015, 03:55 PM
eBAUMANN's Avatar
eBAUMANN eBAUMANN is offline
Imshi Cycles
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Saxtons River, VT
Posts: 9,631
A question of lugged frame aesthetics - sloping vs level top tube?

This stems from my own mixed feelings about sloping tt's...assuming a completely modern build (like the white bike below), which do you guys prefer?




__________________
For Sale --- Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2015, 03:58 PM
8aaron8 8aaron8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,699
I really couldn't stand the look of sloped TT's about a year ago but they have really grown on me, so much so that I believe I will build myself one in the near future To me, they definitely look more the part when equipped with modern components.
__________________
http://arcycles.weebly.com/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:00 PM
toastedbread toastedbread is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 78
I'm not totally against sloping TTs, but I'm much more fond of the level TT look.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:02 PM
Cicli Cicli is offline
Lanterne rouge
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Oro Valley Az.
Posts: 7,194
Level. More classic. Silver group. Alloy wheelset.

Sloped. More modern. Carbon group set. Deeper profile wheelset.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:04 PM
MattTuck's Avatar
MattTuck MattTuck is offline
Classics Fan
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grantham, NH
Posts: 12,265
If you have the flexibility to do do it, go with a flat top tube. I went sloped just to get a little more seat tube exposed.

I'm fine with either, but I do think the level top tube looks better. But bikes aren't meant to be looked at, they're meant to be ridden.
__________________
And we have just one world, But we live in different ones
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:04 PM
m_sasso's Avatar
m_sasso m_sasso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,065
If I was going to purchase a horse I would not settle for a pony!

Level TT!
__________________
Marc Sasso
A part of the resin revolution!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:04 PM
tigoat's Avatar
tigoat tigoat is offline
Yours truly
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 828
I would use a canted top tube only as required. If you are tall enough and don't need it then why bother with it. I have both and like them both.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:06 PM
eBAUMANN's Avatar
eBAUMANN eBAUMANN is offline
Imshi Cycles
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Saxtons River, VT
Posts: 9,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8aaron8 View Post
I really couldn't stand the look of sloped TT's about a year ago but they have really grown on me, so much so that I believe I will build myself one in the near future To me, they definitely look more the part when equipped with modern components.
exactly why im asking haha

thinking of building myself a roadie for this summer (got a big trip planned) and im totally conflicted...because while i am solidly into level tt's, i think the slope gives the frame a more "modern" look...particularly for larger size frames.
__________________
For Sale --- Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:07 PM
eBAUMANN's Avatar
eBAUMANN eBAUMANN is offline
Imshi Cycles
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Saxtons River, VT
Posts: 9,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigoat View Post
I would use a canted top tube only as required. If you are tall enough and don't need it then why bother with it. I have both and like them both.
i guess the idea behind any "compact" frame is that it's lighter and stiffer due to less material and a smaller front triangle. not sure if this was ever actually proven but it sure makes sense in theory.
__________________
For Sale --- Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:11 PM
8aaron8 8aaron8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,699
The sloping TT design definitely makes frames more compact, which helps take care of too much spring in a larger frame. It's a tough call and is ultimately your decision of course.
__________________
http://arcycles.weebly.com/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:13 PM
MattTuck's Avatar
MattTuck MattTuck is offline
Classics Fan
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Grantham, NH
Posts: 12,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by eBAUMANN View Post
i guess the idea behind any "compact" frame is that it's lighter and stiffer due to less material and a smaller front triangle. not sure if this was ever actually proven but it sure makes sense in theory.
Here's my uninformed view on that. It is 100% marketing.

Ok, maybe two frames of the exact same tubing, one being level and one being sloping, you'd get an incremental weight savings... I'm not sure you'd get anything significant in stiffness (atleast very little in pedaling efficiency, that has more to do with the chain stays)...


But your choice of tubing and geometry would have a lot more to do with stiffness than a sloping top tube.
__________________
And we have just one world, But we live in different ones
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:19 PM
8aaron8 8aaron8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattTuck View Post
Here's my uninformed view on that. It is 100% marketing.

Ok, maybe two frames of the exact same tubing, one being level and one being sloping, you'd get an incremental weight savings... I'm not sure you'd get anything significant in stiffness (atleast very little in pedaling efficiency, that has more to do with the chain stays)...


But your choice of tubing and geometry would have a lot more to do with stiffness than a sloping top tube.
I would say that there must exist a small probably indecipherable amount of stiffness added based on the smaller triangles, but would agree that yes geometry and tubing choice plays a much larger role.
__________________
http://arcycles.weebly.com/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:21 PM
bikingshearer bikingshearer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Berkeley CA, The Democratic Peoples Republic
Posts: 1,134
I prefer the look of a level top tube. I am a big guy (6'3", 270lbs) and I ride old lugged steel almost exclusively.

Having said that, I did recently buy a Ritchey Break-Away for travelling, and the look of it has grown on me. So now I am have a preference for level top tubes instead of insisting on them.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:22 PM
parris parris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,873
It depends on how much slope to the t.t. . My JKS has a slight slope and to my eye looks like it'll age well.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-04-2015, 04:22 PM
Ralph Ralph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 6,326
I don't normally pay much attention how a bike looks....other than look to see if it has good parts. And if it looks well maintained.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.