#16
|
||||
|
||||
Seems to me that if a custom builder has a customer that wants something "unique" and it is safe and rideable why not? Might not be my cup of tea but to each their own.
Last edited by johnniecakes; 03-05-2024 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Grammar |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
That's Ti
__________________
http://less-than-epic.blogspot.com/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
If you described this to me I’d hate it, but looking at it I kind of like it. Would never spend that kind of coin it but if you like it, not many out there to negotiate.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
There is no way this bike sells for near the asking amount.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Looking at the wheel build and the double tubes up top... Built for 275-300+ lb rider perhaps?
__________________
This foot tastes terrible! |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I like it- it is a klunker style.
This is just a stylized modern re-play for those who want a modern steed to cos-play a hipster. I have seen this bike- it is heavy, and the double top tube is kinda ugly… I still like/want it because it is just that: different and not particularly pragmatic as a tool. (Full disclosure; I have 3 Indy Fabs in the closet and have owned too many to count over the years).
__________________
http://7sugars.tumblr.com/ |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
People like double top tubes for some reason. No accounting for taste.
I feel like if you're going to make something klunker style, it needs some curved tubes to really pull it off. This just looks like extra weight. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Whoever built this needs drug counseling......BADLY!
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/thedolloff |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
LOL. First thing I thought when I saw the pic is that is very 2006.
I was close. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
This is the only way to do a double top tube.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
They were just channeling their inner Humuhumunukunukuapua’a
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Damn, if only it was a 52 cm!
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
It's really the paint and lugs I find so....not my thing.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Lugs?
|
|
|