Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-07-2023, 02:28 AM
David Benson David Benson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy.mgnr View Post
Hey all - I'm building a 93' Ritchey Road Logic and snagged a set of these Ritchey Logic Compact cranks that I will use set up as a compact double (like in the attached example)...
I checked Sheldon Brown's BB Size database and found this crankset listed with a 110-113 spindle length, however should I go a bit slimmer since I am setting this up double and not triple? Thanks!
I have used Ritchey Sub Compact cranks on a Ritchey Breakaway and a couple of gravel bikes over the last ten years.
On my current gravel bike I am using a 98mm Phil Wood ISO bottom bracket, which results in chainline around 44-45mm and 143mm Q factor with a minimal offset to the left.
Prior to finding the 98mm Phil BB I used Phil and Campagnolo 102mm ISO bottom brackets. Either of these will be easier to find than 98mm.
With 42/29 rings, shifting to the big ring is acceptable but not excellent using either a Campagnolo 10 speed or IRD front derailler.
When I tried the same cranks with 48/32 a Campagnolo 10 speed derailler would not shift to the big ring out of the stand. Your mileage may vary with some other derailler.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-07-2023, 11:03 AM
kingpin75s kingpin75s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Benson View Post
I have used Ritchey Sub Compact cranks on a Ritchey Breakaway and a couple of gravel bikes over the last ten years.
On my current gravel bike I am using a 98mm Phil Wood ISO bottom bracket, which results in chainline around 44-45mm and 143mm Q factor with a minimal offset to the left.
Prior to finding the 98mm Phil BB I used Phil and Campagnolo 102mm ISO bottom brackets. Either of these will be easier to find than 98mm.
With 42/29 rings, shifting to the big ring is acceptable but not excellent using either a Campagnolo 10 speed or IRD front derailler.
When I tried the same cranks with 48/32 a Campagnolo 10 speed derailler would not shift to the big ring out of the stand. Your mileage may vary with some other derailler.

Lol. I was going to mention that I know at least one guy on RBW/iBOB that had custom 98mm Phil BBs made. That said, they will not be found as custom only and not many made, as I understand.

I have just stuck with the Phil or other 103mm JIS, but nice to hear some ISO setups have worked as well.

Like the style guys! TA rings and Grey Logic Compacts. Perfection. My NOS set on a re-build in progress now:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1255_small.jpg (90.2 KB, 51 views)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-07-2023, 09:04 PM
andy.mgnr's Avatar
andy.mgnr andy.mgnr is offline
Dirt Rat
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 71
Love to see I’m not the only one rocking them like this! Just got my 107mm BB today which I ordered before I saw all the confirmation of 103mm, I’m assuming this clearance is looking far too much?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_7973.jpg (62.1 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_7971.jpg (84.8 KB, 42 views)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-08-2023, 01:56 AM
andy.mgnr's Avatar
andy.mgnr andy.mgnr is offline
Dirt Rat
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Benson View Post
I have used Ritchey Sub Compact cranks on a Ritchey Breakaway and a couple of gravel bikes over the last ten years.
On my current gravel bike I am using a 98mm Phil Wood ISO bottom bracket
Interesting I assumed it was a JIS spindle but should I be using an ISO? I didn’t believe them to be interchangeable but is there an advantage to going ISO?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-08-2023, 02:34 AM
David Benson David Benson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy.mgnr View Post
Love to see I’m not the only one rocking them like this! Just got my 107mm BB today which I ordered before I saw all the confirmation of 103mm, I’m assuming this clearance is looking far too much?
This is what mine looks like with the 98mm Phil BB:



and another with Campagnolo 102mm:


[/url]

FWIW I usually measure chainline from the seat tube and add 14.3mm, aka 9/16"
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-08-2023, 02:41 AM
David Benson David Benson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy.mgnr View Post
Interesting I assumed it was a JIS spindle but should I be using an ISO? I didn’t believe them to be interchangeable but is there an advantage to going ISO?
I think that JIS is correct, but if the taper in your cranks is relatively unworn, you can use ISO which will move the chainline inwards.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-08-2023, 02:47 AM
David Benson David Benson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by andy.mgnr View Post
Interesting I assumed it was a JIS spindle but should I be using an ISO? I didn’t believe them to be interchangeable but is there an advantage to going ISO?
I think that JIS is correct, but if the taper in your cranks is relatively unworn, you can use ISO which will move the chainline inwards.

According to Sheldon Brown "if you install a J.I.S. crank on an ISO spindle, it will wind up about 4.5 mm farther in than it would on a J.I.S spindle of the same length."
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-15-2023, 06:01 PM
andy.mgnr's Avatar
andy.mgnr andy.mgnr is offline
Dirt Rat
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 71
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingpin75s View Post
Lol. I was going to mention that I know at least one guy on RBW/iBOB that had custom 98mm Phil BBs made. That said, they will not be found as custom only and not many made, as I understand.

I have just stuck with the Phil or other 103mm JIS, but nice to hear some ISO setups have worked as well.

Like the style guys! TA rings and Grey Logic Compacts. Perfection. My NOS set on a re-build in progress now:
Got my 102 ISO square taper and the chain line is much better! However I’m having an impossible time setting up the front derailleur, did either of you run into this?

It takes a ton of tension to get it shift up it seems and it always throws it over the outer chainring into the crank arm, if I tighten up the outer limit screw enough that it doesn’t drop it won’t quite be able to shift up into the big ring! I’m on 50-34 rings and a full Chorus 11 2015+ group.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bottom bracket, length, spindle


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.