Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2017, 03:22 PM
BobO's Avatar
BobO BobO is offline
AZ Slowpoke
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 857
First Carbon Bike

Up until this point I have been on steel and aluminum bikes. Now, I'm just beginning the thought processes of getting my first carbon bike. I'm going to set the budget at a measly $3000. I would like to have at a minimum 6800 Ultegra, though to be honest I have nothing against the 11-speed 105. I would like to have 50mm deep section wheels that are tubeless capable. I like an "aggressive" "race" geometry for this kind of ride and I'd like it to be an "aero race" bike.

I think most of my miles will still be on my old reliable Giant TCR on Ksyrium Elite wheels that has proven itself to be pretty bulletproof. This bike will be for my "races", which are the occasional century, metric, etc., and for some Merckx style TTs that I like doing. It'll probably also find it's way into my faster group rides.

The offering that I've found that my mind keeps going back to is the Giant Propel Advanced 1.

Which seems to check all of the right boxes and is very close to the desired price point.

Does anyone have some suggestions that maybe I haven't considered?
__________________
Old'n'Slow
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2017, 03:32 PM
John H. John H. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,641
Propel

Propel brakes are awful if that matters.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2017, 03:42 PM
BobO's Avatar
BobO BobO is offline
AZ Slowpoke
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by John H. View Post
Propel brakes are awful if that matters.
How so?
__________________
Old'n'Slow
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2017, 03:56 PM
saab2000's Avatar
saab2000 saab2000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,536
I'd be much more inclined to go with one of their road Advanced models. I don't know anything about those brakes, but the cable routing is wonky. For my money I'd go with one with traditional caliper brakes.

That said, Giant is good bike. I own one and am generally quite pleased with it.

As to the premise of the thread, carbon is a great material for a bike frame.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2017, 04:07 PM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Haven't ridden one personally, but a buddy rides a propel regularly and has no complaints about the brakes, though he usually descends a lot faster than me here in the Hills.

Giant makes great stuff. I'm a big fan of my TCX Advanced and they would be on the short list of any carbon bike I'd get. Their TCR is really, really nice.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2017, 04:34 PM
BobO's Avatar
BobO BobO is offline
AZ Slowpoke
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashUNC View Post
Haven't ridden one personally, but a buddy rides a propel regularly and has no complaints about the brakes, though he usually descends a lot faster than me here in the Hills.

Giant makes great stuff. I'm a big fan of my TCX Advanced and they would be on the short list of any carbon bike I'd get. Their TCR is really, really nice.
I agree, and I'd add that Giant tends to punch above it's weight at given price points.

I have a TCR2 which is the one-year hydroformed ALUX SL frame. I have about 17,000 miles on it and I still love it. It's light and stiff in the right ways. It came with Tiagra components but I have since upgraded to 5800. The geometry fits me well for how I ride. I'll definitely keep that bike until its worn out. What it isn't though, is aero. The bladed fork is fine, but the downtube is this giant square shaped brick in the air. I guess the newer carbon TCRs are better aero, but, I feel like that would be duplicating what I already have too much.
__________________
Old'n'Slow
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2017, 05:21 PM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobO View Post
I agree, and I'd add that Giant tends to punch above it's weight at given price points.

I have a TCR2 which is the one-year hydroformed ALUX SL frame. I have about 17,000 miles on it and I still love it. It's light and stiff in the right ways. It came with Tiagra components but I have since upgraded to 5800. The geometry fits me well for how I ride. I'll definitely keep that bike until its worn out. What it isn't though, is aero. The bladed fork is fine, but the downtube is this giant square shaped brick in the air. I guess the newer carbon TCRs are better aero, but, I feel like that would be duplicating what I already have too much.
Honestly, I think the TCR would replace that ALUX SL frame. at TCR carbon would be an ideal do-it-all road bike for what you described, I'd think.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2017, 07:55 PM
rnhood rnhood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ormond Beach
Posts: 4,476
I have ridden both, and agree with the sentiment here - get the TCR road bike. The Propel, especially the Advanced 1 model you are looking at, isn't as comfortable or as confident inspiring, imho. Aero frames are more fashion than function for most. The TCR is a fine all around bike and it will never hold you back.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-10-2017, 08:07 PM
shovelhd's Avatar
shovelhd shovelhd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Western MA
Posts: 6,379
But...he already owns a TCR.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-10-2017, 10:59 PM
kramnnim kramnnim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Woodleaf, NC
Posts: 6,945
Local friend was riding a Propel Advanced SL...says the brakes are horrible. He bought a BH G7 and is parting out the Giant.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-10-2017, 11:10 PM
FlashUNC FlashUNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 14,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelhd View Post
But...he already owns a TCR.
the alloy, not the carbon if I'm understanding his post.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-10-2017, 11:16 PM
BobO's Avatar
BobO BobO is offline
AZ Slowpoke
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tucson
Posts: 857
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashUNC View Post
the alloy, not the carbon if I'm understanding his post.
Correct, but this isn't the "normal" alloy frame, it's the lighter weight hydroformed one. The geometry is the same as the carbon TCRs but with shaped and larger tubes. On my way home I stopped at my LBS and inquired about the 2018 TCR and learned that there are some differences in geometry for this year.
__________________
Old'n'Slow
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-10-2017, 11:36 PM
beeatnik beeatnik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,897
Spend an extra $500

Get this:
http://www.feltbicycles.com/USA/2016...MESET-AR1.aspx

with a pair of used deep profile carbon tubulars and a group from the UK

or

Get this:

http://www.feltbicycles.com/USA/2016.../aero/AR5.aspx

and spend a few days on Weight Weenies to find the perfect Chinese-made, carbon clincher wheelset

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/fo...f=113&t=103936
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-11-2017, 12:31 AM
Fivethumbs Fivethumbs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,114
How about a Ridley Fenix SL? I have an Excalibur that I just love. When I replace it, it will be with a Fenix.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-11-2017, 06:08 AM
dancinkozmo's Avatar
dancinkozmo dancinkozmo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,477
how about cannondale EVO ultegra ?

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.