#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It does seem that a common reason for accidents is that the driver has poor visibility for one reason or another. This is not a sufficient excuse because if a driver cannot see well enough to drive safely, then the driver shouldn't be driving at all. Thought I hardly expect logic to make any difference in the real world. Cyclists really have to go above and beyond to mitigate the risks since they are way more vulnerable, as we read in this thread. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
It is simplistic and unrealistic, I admit it. We all drive at one point or another in substandard conditions because it is often impractical to immediately stop, pull over or delay. Usually the outcome is a non-event.
Still the logic should ideally be to look where you are going...and by look I mean positively see where you are going. Quote:
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Hope your friend is doing better. She got lucky.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Dump-truck hits rider in our group this morning
Very glad your friend is ok Keith.
I have to say the bigger picture and the discussion going on as a sidebar is very interesting to me. The driver is clearly at fault. I understand the instinct to avoid the road as a cyclist, as I probably would. But I agree that a driver who can't see has a huge responsibility. I am a driver in addition to being a cyclist. In these situations i get the same worried alarmed feeling I get when I am cycling. But while driving, the question is what if I kill someone. I guess I should worry what if a car is passing and I head on collide and get killed. The point though is that it is not (or should not be) unrealistic to expect that drivers understand that sunrise and sunset can cause blindness. Shockingly, the sun rises and sets every single day. There is nothing new there and if you are operating a car let alone a dump truck at that time of day and you do not expect that it could happen, then you are being reckless. Now, I would adjust my behavior as a cyclist. I would rather be alive than right. But I don't see how we shouldn't expect the driver in this case to have acted better. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Glad she's ok. A co-worker and his pack of 4 where all killed in a similar incident by a 16 yo driving with her dad. They came over a rise and were blinded by the low sun. Horrible for all.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
For a number of years now I have ridden with a tail light, or two, all the time.
Then I started riding with a headlight too. Then i realized I was riding my commuter bike all the time because it has a dynamo and lights. That was the point where i really accepted that my style of riding had changed and even went so far as to get a dynamo wheel built up for my "go fast" bike too. I basically never ride anymor without them and both head and tail lights and, yes, i probably get made fun of. So what. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
I'm so glad that she is OK. These kinds of things are so alarming to hear about. It's a relief to hear a story that ends OK.
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
The use of a light in daylight hours should be a standard procedure, because "why not"? The cyclist physical profile is so small relative to a vehicle, anything that makes you more visible is a plus. So what if it's dorky (use a mirror too), the potential for failure is just too great. OKAY, rant off...so glad her injuries were not life threatening.
__________________
Bike lives matter! |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Hope your friend is heeling. The value of running lights during daylight hours cannot be overstated. We need all the help we can get to ensure drivers see us.
I was in an accident in May. Also no broken bones or bad injuries. Bike was totaled though. Driver's insurance replaced cost of my bicycle, and just the other day they called and offered me a additional settlement. I never asked or got an attorney involved. The insurance company just called me. nice surprise |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
(sorry for the thread drift...)
__________________
bonCourage!cycling |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|