Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 04-27-2013, 09:38 AM
thirdgenbird thirdgenbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Dog View Post
Not true. The clicking is real and can and does happen when the faces are perfectly parallel. I can attest to this. My BB is perfectly square/parallel and the threads were also perfectly cut, yet I had the clicking. The width of the shell was a bit undersized. The newer cups seem to have changed design and eliminated the clicking that rougemechanic talks about. When I put a new set of cups on I did not need the extra wavy washer. An extra wavy washer or shims was the only cure for shells that were a bit under width with the older cups to solve the clicking issue.
Rougemechanic preaches putting the shim in the wrong place for undersized shells. If the shell is truly undersized, the shim should go on the bb face. Using two wavy washers or shims in the cups changes preload.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-27-2013, 09:56 AM
Lionel Lionel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aix en Provence
Posts: 1,915
Was there a change in UT cups design ? When did this happen ? Not aware of that.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-27-2013, 10:03 AM
thirdgenbird thirdgenbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lionel View Post
Was there a change in UT cups design ? When did this happen ? Not aware of that.
Yes.

Not sure on date, but I noticed a tolerance change going from "silver record" cups to the new "green record" cups. (Based on potatos advice) Campagnolo only touts the new cups as lighter and EPS compatible. I'm wondering if the reduced side to side movement improves front shifting with EPS.

Last edited by thirdgenbird; 04-27-2013 at 10:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-27-2013, 10:15 AM
Lionel Lionel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aix en Provence
Posts: 1,915
green record ? Even more confused now. I have 2 record UT cups and 2 super record UT cups. The SR are black, the record are dark grey.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-27-2013, 10:20 AM
thirdgenbird thirdgenbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lionel View Post
green record ? Even more confused now. I have 2 record UT cups and 2 super record UT cups. The SR are black, the record are dark grey.
Original record cups like mine were silverish, then they were more of a gray (I think), and now they have a greenish tint and say EPS on them. Going from silver to green resulted in less lateral play for me.

SR cups have always been black but I think there are two generations. Original and EPS compatible. Unsure if there is any difference as I don't have a need for cups without seals.

Last edited by thirdgenbird; 04-27-2013 at 10:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-27-2013, 11:52 AM
cfox cfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Dog View Post
Not true. The clicking is real and can and does happen when the faces are perfectly parallel. I can attest to this. My BB is perfectly square/parallel and the threads were also perfectly cut, yet I had the clicking. The width of the shell was a bit undersized. The newer cups seem to have changed design and eliminated the clicking that rougemechanic talks about. When I put a new set of cups on I did not need the extra wavy washer. An extra wavy washer or shims was the only cure for shells that were a bit under width with the older cups to solve the clicking issue.
Yes, I agree, and that is what I wrote; if your cups are undersized, that is one of the ways you can get noise. Roquemechanic seems to think the system is flawed even for BBs that are within spec. You will get a tiny bit of spring loaded play even with a properly sized BB, but it won't click. He advocates shimming away all of the play in every BB, which will only lead to your bearings dying a quick death.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-27-2013, 12:05 PM
HillDancer HillDancer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdgenbird View Post
Rougemechanic preaches putting the shim in the wrong place for undersized shells. If the shell is truly undersized, the shim should go on the bb face. Using two wavy washers or shims in the cups changes preload.
The Rogue Mechanic Campagnolo Ultra-Torque Shims are placed between the non-drive outboard cup and the bottom bracket shell. Please explain how this is the "wrong place" to compensate for differences in shell width.

For those that don't have excessive lateral movement of a Campy outboard bearing crank, good of you. I've installed and ride UT & PT cranks, both have enough side movement to click & clack when climbing out of the saddle. The movement and noise can be replicated with mere thumb pressure on the non-drive crank end. The shells are faced and parallel; the shell on the UT installation is at the low end of Campy spec, the PT installation is at the high end of spec.

Rogue Mechanic's Campagnolo Ultra-Torque Shim Kits have a variety of shim depths not available from other retail sources. Selecting an appropriate shim stack is critical for precision fitment without excessive pre-load.



Quote:
Originally Posted by cfox View Post
...Roquemechanic...advocates shimming away all of the play in every BB, which will only lead to your bearings dying a quick death.
Where's the proof of this negative assertion? If this were the case then all other outboard bearing systems would be short lived also.

Campagnolo is a brand, not a religion; Rogue Mechanic is not a heretic. My own faith in Campagnolism has diminished somewhat after discovering "made in China" on my replacement steel UT bearing box. I now think the UT bearing knocking back & forth between the retaining clip and cup is less likely the cause of the original bearing's early demise, than poor bearing manufacturer materials and construction.

Last edited by HillDancer; 04-27-2013 at 12:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-27-2013, 12:48 PM
thirdgenbird thirdgenbird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,615
Sorry, I was referring to this nonsense on rougemechanics sites:



Using a bb shim to get the shell in spec is fine. Shimming to remove the wavy washer is nonsense. Campagnolo isn't the only manufacture to use this type of axle and they are not the only who use a wavy washer. Additionally, he seems to have propagated almost all the threads on UT noise.

I'm not 100% pleased with UT do to shorter bearing life but mine have never made a clicking noise. Disassembly of the bearing also proved it was a contamination failure, nothing to do with movement or alignment. My disappointment with UT is seal related. They just don't last as long as the square taper bearings.

My ultra-torque bearings say made in Italy. When did you but yours?

Last edited by thirdgenbird; 04-27-2013 at 01:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-27-2013, 12:55 PM
Black Dog's Avatar
Black Dog Black Dog is offline
Riding Along
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rockwood ON, Canada
Posts: 6,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfox View Post
Yes, I agree, and that is what I wrote; if your cups are undersized, that is one of the ways you can get noise. Roquemechanic seems to think the system is flawed even for BBs that are within spec. You will get a tiny bit of spring loaded play even with a properly sized BB, but it won't click. He advocates shimming away all of the play in every BB, which will only lead to your bearings dying a quick death.
I agree with you. There should be some play so as to not side load the bearings to death. Campy solved the problems that he was harping on with the redesign of the cups.
__________________
Cheers...Daryl
Life is too important to be taken seriously
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-27-2013, 03:11 PM
Dave Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 5,905
Perhaps there has been a redesign to the cups, but the current instructions that list the BB width tolerance have not changed. All the "redesign" could amount to is a small increase in the width between the inside faces of the cups, or a new wave washer that is either stronger, and/or has more available squash range.

http://www.campagnolo.com/repository...UK_06_2012.pdf

If a BB shell is under the width limit, it makes no difference what side a shim is placed. Either side will increase the overall width and increase the wave washer tension.

The idea of using two wave washers or a shim next to the wave washer is stupid. The design is such that a BB at the maximum width leaves little room for any shimming. If the BB is undersize, shim the cups.

Using a stack of shims in place of the wave washer is the worst idea. You have to take the thing apart multiple times and then live with bearings that are either too tight or too loose. Even .002 inch of axial play can feel sloppy.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-27-2013, 03:46 PM
jds108 jds108 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Big Sky Country
Posts: 1,142
I slightly regret bringing up the shims. I bought a set of them and got the correct amount figured out to place between the bb shell and cups with a bit of trial and error. So now no wavy washer, no side to side movement, and not so many shims that anything is binding. The shims in the kit go down to .1mm if my memory is correct. No little creak/pop either.

Maybe I got lucky, but it worked for me.

In my opinion, the whole wavy washer concept in a bb is questionable. Zipp did this 10+ years ago with their rear cassette hubs and it didn't work in that application.

Some folks may experience creaking bbs, some may not. Of those that do, there will of course be a variety of root causes. I think that the axle and bearing shifting relative to the cups is one possible cause. One possible solution to that is to eliminate that shift by removing any potential for side-to-side movement by moving the cups outward ever so slightly. Hopefully we would all check bb shell alignment/facing before going with aftermarket shims....

But I don't quite get the negativity towards the shims placed between shell and cups.

I guess I just hope that Campy's redesign tightens things up a bit. Their Power Torque assemblies certainly seem to have things fit together more "tightly". (I have only installed one PT bb/crank and the cups/bearings/axle are all so snug in PT that it takes a LOT of effort to physically push the axle sideways in the bb/shell whereas my older UT systems are pretty easy to push the axle sideways with hand force).

Last edited by jds108; 04-27-2013 at 05:44 PM. Reason: clarity!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-27-2013, 04:01 PM
ultraman6970 ultraman6970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 22,852
What the rogue mechanic says is not totally non sense IMO, for some idiotic reason I have noticed that the wavy washer is not strong enough and gets worn quite quick and you develop a clank or a darn creak in the crankset.

It doesnt happen with all the cranksets neither with all the frames, a friend had a creak using an athena UT crankset, took a look, we put a second wavy washer and the tiny play went away and the creak gone.

As for the record UT cups, they are in the 3rd incarnation (sr no idea since are black)... have a set of each color and you can tell the tolerances are more tight in the greenish ones. Is not that much, maybe a mm total between the 2 cups, so if you look at it the non sense the rogue mechanic is talking is not that inaccurate, but again it depends a lot of the bike because the creaks and clanks some experience do not happen with all the bikes.

Not defending the rogue mechanic just in case ok?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-27-2013, 04:20 PM
saab2000's Avatar
saab2000 saab2000 is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,538
Mine are swimming in grease. No creaks.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-27-2013, 04:44 PM
oldpotatoe's Avatar
oldpotatoe oldpotatoe is online now
Proud Grandpa
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Republic of Boulder, USA
Posts: 47,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lionel View Post
Was there a change in UT cups design ? When did this happen ? Not aware of that.
First gen. was silver, second gen was a gold color, third, current gen is greenish.

2007 until about 2009..2009 until about 2010..greenish in 2010..to today.

Each gen had tighter tolerances.

No need for anything but what comes in the cups..all else means the BB shell 'ain't right'.
__________________
Chisholm's Custom Wheels
Qui Si Parla Campagnolo
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-27-2013, 05:30 PM
HillDancer HillDancer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdgenbird View Post
Sorry, I was referring to this nonsense on rougemechanics sites:...When did you but yours?
The image you displayed is without context, how about showing a link to the original article?

Here are the official instructions, without the propaganda "nonsense".
http://roguemechanic.typepad.com/rog...ra-torque.html

Image of Campagnolo UT steel bearing box shown below.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg UT Steel Bearings.jpg (62.2 KB, 178 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.