Know the rules The Paceline Forum Builder's Spotlight


Go Back   The Paceline Forum > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 03-30-2017, 01:57 PM
fourflys's Avatar
fourflys fourflys is offline
Back At It!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 7,537
not much difference to me in short or med/long reach brakes....

Here is my Black Mtn Road

__________________
Be the Reason Others Succeed
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-30-2017, 05:53 PM
John H. John H. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,641
Whiskey

How do you like the Whiskey fork?
Would the fork also work with a short reach brake? Or mid-reach only?

Quote:
Originally Posted by yancy0303 View Post
My All-City Mr Pink with Whisky road fork and Tektro R539 brakes



........_o
......_\\ >,
....(_)/(_)
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-30-2017, 08:18 PM
Gartenmeister Gartenmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Posts: 504
Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryScientist View Post
because rivendell bikes are not heavy enough as it is, loaded down with steel forks, steel railed leather saddles, full cage pedals, and fancy waxed canvass luggage, so they throw in an extra top tube to keep the weight up.

That bike as pictured, with everything except for the front rack, but including Brooks, leather tape, obese tires, cross levers, pedals and the double top tube, weighs under 25lbs. Since I believe Grant says a useful bike begins around 25lbs, with the rack it qualifies.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-30-2017, 11:07 PM
doomridesout doomridesout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,672
I think the Whisky fork is for mid-reach only, you can't run a short reach caliper on it and hit the rim. It seems like a great option, particularly if you can't handle the looks of the Seven and Wound-Up forks.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 08-12-2017, 08:38 PM
merckx merckx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gartenmeister View Post
Old photo. Has 700x42 on it now, with room to spare.




I like this machine.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 08-12-2017, 08:47 PM
weisan's Avatar
weisan weisan is offline
ZhugeLiang
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Back in Austin, Texas
Posts: 17,469
__________________
🏻*
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-12-2017, 08:58 PM
Peter B Peter B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sierra Foothills
Posts: 2,903
Custom randoRex.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0470.jpg (140.6 KB, 653 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0475.jpg (93.8 KB, 653 views)
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-12-2017, 09:10 PM
rousseau rousseau is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Southwestern Ontario, Canuckland
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by doomridesout View Post
Lets see your modern bikes with long reach sidepulls.

Title says it all... My next bike will be a mid-reach rim brake road bike... Still deciding on lugged steel F/F or titanium with the new Whisky fork. Lets see and talk about the bikes you have with the current gen of dual pivot mid reach brakes.
I know this thread is four pages long, but it started before I joined the site. Can anyone explain what these terms mean to the uninitiated?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-12-2017, 10:00 PM
classtimesailer classtimesailer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 648
Mid reach and long reach brakes have longer arms which let you fit taller/fatter tires on your bike provided the frame has clearance(fork blades/crown and brake bridge/stays). Some folks use the longer reach to run smaller 650B wheels and even fatter tires. The longer reach also allows room for fenders under the brake and above the tires. Some frames are designed for longer than normal reach brakes like my Milwaukee Road and you can't use regular modern Campy or Shimano (short reach) brakes. Some say mid-long reach brakes are less effective or whatever. Whatever. Mine will fit fenders and 28s.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0442.jpg (80.3 KB, 640 views)
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-13-2017, 11:12 AM
jbf jbf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 45
side1-1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 08-13-2017, 11:43 AM
Andy340 Andy340 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 303
Attached image
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0191.jpg (54.2 KB, 598 views)
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 08-13-2017, 02:44 PM
Ed-B Ed-B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by rousseau View Post
I know this thread is four pages long, but it started before I joined the site. Can anyone explain what these terms mean to the uninitiated?
These terms apply to side-pull caliper brakes and describe the distance from the center of the mounting hole to the center of the braking surface of the rim.

Short reach brakes are what you normally find on road racing bikes. The mid and longer reach brakes are usually specified when the bike is going to be fitted with larger tires and/or fenders. Also, as mentioned before, long reach brakes are frequently used when converting 700C bikes to 650B wheels, which have a 19mm smaller radius. You swap from short to long reach brakes and change the wheels from 700C to 650B so you can fit bigger tires.

In general they have the following dimensions:

A short reach brake typically will adjust between 39-49mm.

A mid reach brake (aka normal reach) is typically 47-57mm.

A long reach brake is typically from 57-73mm.

Also, as the brakes get longer, the arms are usually wider, and may employ quick release mechanism that allow the caliper to open further to clear a larger, inflated tire.

Ed.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 08-13-2017, 03:00 PM
ORMojo ORMojo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,428
May as well post here also!



Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 08-13-2017, 04:37 PM
Bradford's Avatar
Bradford Bradford is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistermo View Post

This is precisely my predicament. My favorite category of bike, but when I've got road and cross bikes, it never gets called into service.
mistermo should change his name to misternuts

This bike lives in Colorado now and I couldn't be happier. Since he sold it to me it is getting all of my riding time. My normal ride is half dirt, half pavement, up hill for about an hour, then some 45 mph descents back home. Its about 2 pounds heavier than my Legend, but its more comfortable (especially on the GP4000 28s/wide rims), and a much better riding position for the solo rides I do. I'll keep my Legend for times I ride with other people, but this is the perfect bike for 95% of the riding I do.

What a great bike for just riding.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 08-13-2017, 05:05 PM
Lyle_Savant Lyle_Savant is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4

I do a couple of 25 mile rides a week on my KHS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.