#91
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
I've seen this movie in person. The smartest guys in the room buy a perfectly good company and promptly proceed to destroy it. And it's not always private equity loading them up with debt.
In my personal experience the future was writ large almost immediately. I abandoned ship when it started to list to port. There was no sense in waiting around to witness the actual sinking.
__________________
It's not an adventure until something goes wrong. - Yvon C. |
#94
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
“Within the Kent Outdoors family of brands, we pride ourselves on a robust legacy characterized by resilience and an unwavering ability to overcome hurdles, consistently emerging stronger in the face of adversity," said C.J. Vlahovich, who leads Kent's Watersports division. "While the path to improvement has been demanding, our devoted team remains steadfast in our conviction that Kent Outdoors is destined to continue as the foremost innovator in cultivating vibrant brands that elevate outdoor enjoyment for all." Last edited by RWL2222; 04-21-2024 at 08:10 AM. |
#95
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We're seeing a correction of sorts - just browse Trek's website - but I don't think we're anywhere near bottom. All of this is different from the whole Kona situation, which just sounds like scummy VC and even worse management. I always pegged Kona as a roach of the cycling industry - un-killable. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Right, every time I see someone do the actual math the pricing changes are bang-on for inflation aside from the absolute top of the market.
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The issue is that there has been a lot of advancement at the top so people who want to ride the same bikes the pros are riding have to pay a lot more. This can create social pressures where people buying bikes based on some perceived status feel they have to spend more money to maintain the same perceived status level of their bike. This is a real phenomenon, particularly in a competitive environment like racing, but it's a very different phenomenon than "inflation."
__________________
Instagram - DannAdore Bicycles |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
CAAD 9 was great, but, the new bike will have more tire clearance, probably ride nicer, disc brakes, 11/12-speed and better gear ranges, and so on. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
I do think folks want to present inflation as the same item for the same price.
No one is asking what the price of an iPhone 10 is right now. They compare the newest iPhone in 2024 to the newest iPhone in 2014. They don’t say inflation doesn’t apply because it has a bigger screen, faster processor and additional cameras. Likewise when considering the cost of automobiles, I don’t see the same consideration of trying to adjust inflation consideration to subtract technological advances. This apples to apples comparison strategy seems to lose track of why road cycling is perceived as less and less accessible. I think that comparing an aluminum bike from 2006 to a carbon bike in 2024 isn’t particularly unreasonable when you look at market share. I fear this kind of thinking will create blindspots in the industry that will just make road cycling more and more out of touch from most people in the same way skiing has gone. With the continuing trickle done effect that more and more people will view bikes on roads as at best a nuisance and at worst trespassers. |
#101
|
||||
|
||||
I think this is a little more complicated than you present. Most People don’t really understand the technical specifications of things. They don’t choose 105 because of the materials and ratings of the bearings or alloys used or whatever. Most of the time they do t really think they are choosing 105, they are choosing a cannondale r2000 or whatever, they probably have some idea of how close this is from the top or bottom and have tried to choose something that will work and seems to align with their sense of who they are in society.
So it may be true that an aluminum cannondale with 105 is the same price from 2006 to now. But if you add a bunch of price points on top of it it gets pushed farther down making it appear lower end. Like how the relaunch of super record makes record less high end and to many people kind of worse. Quote:
__________________
please don't take anything I say personally, I am an idiot. |
#102
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Anyways, I do think there has been a big jump in price for some bikes in the middle of the market too. There are 105 bike options from major brands that are carbon frame with 12sp di2, hydraulic disc brakes, aluminum wheels, and full internal routing priced at $5000. ^ That sort of bike slimply didn't exist as widely available stock oem option for $4100 in 2019. It didn't exist in part because 105 was 11sp cable, but that's part of the point- costs have increased past inflation in some instances because the level being compared has jumped in features. Again, not disagreeing with your point that the top of the market has surged in cost. It definitely has, in many instances. |
#103
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I partly see the point you are making and partly don't understand it at all. Your comment about not being able to compare apples to aolles because the tech is fundamentally different is a good one, and I referenced that in a post I just made about 105 now compared to 105 bike from 5 years ago. I don't understand why you conclude this creates blinds spots in the industry though. I think the industry is very aware of the consequences of advancing tech and addresses those consequences in varying ways. - SRAM for the road has clearly said 'we don't care' about offering less expensive options. - Shimano for the road has clearly said 'we partly don't care, but we also partly do care, oh and here is some sort of universal plug-n-play tech that we think will work for the less expensive end of the market'. - Campy has clearly said 'ci preoccupiamo solo dei vecchi ricchi'. - And brands like Microshift, ltwoo, and Sensah have clearly said 'we will fill the void and maybe convince users to them upgrade to our more advanced tech later on'. I really don't think this is a blind spot to the industry. You can still buy a major brand road bike for under $1k, not discounted- Trek domane al2. One of my kids has had one of those for 4 years now and even trained for and rode an ironman on it. Road cycling can be very accessible still. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Take a look at these ~$4k bikes released in 2019, they’re about the equal to that $5k 105 di2 bike now: https://99spokes.com/bikes/lauf/2019...eekend-warrior https://99spokes.com/bikes/canyon/20...l-disc-8.0-di2 https://99spokes.com/bikes/fezzari/2019/empire-sl-pro https://99spokes.com/bikes/trek/2019/domane-sl-6-disc https://99spokes.com/bikes/specializ...rmac-disc-comp https://99spokes.com/bikes/specializ...ompultegra-di2 |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
I agree that there are deals out there and one can break into the sport on a budget. I do it by riding last decade's technology. But I think there's a lot of momentum against it.
I hear reports of a real like of enthusiasm from shops when friends go looking for those bikes when they feel they've outgrown their hybrid or want to ride more once their kids are older and less dependent on them. Likewise, my college aged son reports quite a bit of snobbery towards lower tier bikes and/or disbelief about the functionality of those bikes provided the right (human) motor among his riding peers. I know I'll be told cassettes and chains are so much better now, but I can't get my brain around the cost a new twelve speed chain and cassette. And prices have started to come down. I just broke into 10 speed with my friction shifters, so I know it can be down, but the I fear the increased cost of the cool bikes in the magazine gear reviews and in the shops is awfully off-putting and isn't helping grow the sport. |
|
|