View Single Post
  #12  
Old 07-03-2011, 09:32 AM
Kontact Kontact is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sunny Seattle
Posts: 2,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpotatoe
I guess this begs the question, why on earth is cervelo designing such a thing? Do they really think Rotor cranks and this frame/BB design design is the epitome of BB/crank design(aoing with a Look carbon ashtabula crank)?

This along with some other recalls and marketing/design decisions makes me think they are adrift.

This design is silly.
Because it makes the BB stiffer, and Rotor, SRAM and FSA are making specific cranks for it - which are simply BB30 cranks with longer spindles and a shallower NDS arm.

Campy is making a specific adapter for it, and Shimano doesn't support either BB30, BB86 or BBright, so that makes BBright no less stupid than the other two.


I'm not much of a Cervelo fan, but the design seems to work and hasn't been plagued with the problems of BB90, and gives more heel clearance than BB86, so I'm not sure why it is any sillier than tapered steerer tubes or 31.8 bars.
Reply With Quote