View Single Post
  #40  
Old 04-29-2024, 04:48 PM
Gummee Gummee is offline
Old, Fat & Slow
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NoVA for now
Posts: 6,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McM View Post
That math only applies for cruising gears. Since this thread is about very low climbing gears with roughly a 1:1 ratio of chainring size to rear sprocket size, 1 tooth in the back is worth pretty close 1 tooth in the front.

A bigger cassette in the back works only up to a point, because most road derailleurs will have a maximum sprocket size (and Campagnolo road derailleurs typically have a more limited maximum size than the S groups). Another disadvantage of larger cassettes is that they require a derailleur with a larger capacity (i.e. longer cage), whereas reducing chainring size generally doesn't require the derailleur capacity to increase. It should also be noted that larger cassette also usually means bigger jumps between gear sizes.
I was sorta wrong. It's only 2ish teeth when you get to bigger cogs
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qrA8K7vqNR0/maxresdefault.jpg

The fact still remains that it's easier and cheaper to run bigger cogs than swap out cranksets *in most cases.*

M
Reply With Quote